Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1267782
| From | Marc Titinger <mtitinger@baylibre.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC 4/4] iio: ina2xx: add SOFTWARE buffer mode using an iio kfifo. |
| Date | 2015-11-12 11:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qtX90-7C4-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qtjEC-7hv-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <qtjED-7hv-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <qtlQ6-9M-27@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 10/11/2015 19:23, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: > On 11/10/2015 05:07 PM, Marc Titinger wrote: >> Capture the active scan_elements into a kfifo. >> The capture thread will compute the remaining time until the next capture >> tick, and do an active wait (udelay). >> >> This will produce a stream of up to fours channels plus a 64bits >> timestamps (ns). >> >> # iio_readdev ina226 | od -x >> WARNING: High-speed mode not enabled >> 0000000 042f 0d5a 002e 010c 4be8 4eb4 0013 0000 >> 0000020 0430 0d5a 002e 010c a704 4f3e 0013 0000 >> 0000040 0430 0d5a 002e 010c b477 4fc7 0013 0000 >> 0000060 042f 0d5b 002e 010c 8052 5050 0013 0000 >> 0000100 042f 0d5b 002e 010c 5d92 50d8 0013 0000 >> 0000120 0430 0d5a 002e 010c fa59 515e 0013 0000 >> 0000140 0430 0d5b 002e 010c 95d2 51e5 0013 0000 >> >> Signed-off-by: Marc Titinger <mtitinger@baylibre.com> Hi Lars, > > Interesting approach. I think if we are going to due this we want to make > this kind of emulation generic. Have you seen the software trigger and > configfs support patches[1] from Daniel? It kind of achieves the same as you > do, but using hrtimers. I totally agree, let me have a look on those patches maybe I could add an active waiting scheme for platforms w/o hrtimers ? > >> >> --- >> Ina2xx does not support auto-increment, hence the capture threads sticks >> with single register reads instead of regmap_bulk_read. >> >> The proper scales must be applied to those raw register >> values, I'm in favor of doing the conversion in userland in a client plugin > > Yes, conversion should not be done in kernel space, we don't want to impose > the performance penalty on users which don't need it and you can typically > do it faster in userspace anyway where you have floats and SSE and what not. > >> for instance a sigrok > > Slightly OT, but do you already have some Sigrok IIO support? I have this > scheduled for end of the month, maybe we can align our strategies here and > avoid duplicated work. How fortunate! I've started some preliminary work like cloning the demo driver into a skeletton for 'hardware/generic-iio/api.c', adding the build/ac plumbing, and linking to libiio with the idea of using iio_info to create a generic enumeration of the iio-context into sigrok channels. Now, I'm not familiar with Glib and it might not be my prio until a couple of weeks, so I'd be super happy to wait for you if you are keen to do that part :) What would be the best spot to chat about this ? Marc. > > - Lars > > [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/8/10/877 > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC 0/4] IIO: add support for INA2xx power monitor Marc Titinger <mtitinger@baylibre.com> - 2015-11-10 17:10 +0100
[RFC 1/4] iio: ina2xx: add direct IO support for TI INA2xx Power Monitors Marc Titinger <mtitinger@baylibre.com> - 2015-11-10 17:10 +0100
Re: [RFC 1/4] iio: ina2xx: add direct IO support for TI INA2xx Power Monitors Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@gmail.com> - 2015-11-11 11:20 +0100
Re: [RFC 1/4] iio: ina2xx: add direct IO support for TI INA2xx Power Monitors Marc Titinger <mtitinger@baylibre.com> - 2015-11-12 10:30 +0100
Re: [RFC 1/4] iio: ina2xx: add direct IO support for TI INA2xx Power Monitors Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@gmail.com> - 2015-11-11 13:20 +0100
Re: [RFC 1/4] iio: ina2xx: add direct IO support for TI INA2xx Power Monitors Marc Titinger <mtitinger@baylibre.com> - 2015-11-12 10:40 +0100
[RFC v2 1/2] iio: ina2xx: add direct IO support for TI INA2xx Power Monitors Marc Titinger <mtitinger@baylibre.com> - 2015-11-12 14:00 +0100
[RFC v2 2/2] iio: ina2xx: add SOFTWARE buffer mode using an iio kfifo. Marc Titinger <mtitinger@baylibre.com> - 2015-11-12 14:00 +0100
Re: [RFC v2 1/2] iio: ina2xx: add direct IO support for TI INA2xx Power Monitors Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> - 2015-11-14 20:10 +0100
Re: [RFC v2 1/2] iio: ina2xx: add direct IO support for TI INA2xx Power Monitors Marc Titinger <mtitinger@baylibre.com> - 2015-11-16 10:40 +0100
[RFC 4/4] iio: ina2xx: add SOFTWARE buffer mode using an iio kfifo. Marc Titinger <mtitinger@baylibre.com> - 2015-11-10 17:10 +0100
Re: [RFC 4/4] iio: ina2xx: add SOFTWARE buffer mode using an iio kfifo. Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de> - 2015-11-10 19:30 +0100
Re: [RFC 4/4] iio: ina2xx: add SOFTWARE buffer mode using an iio kfifo. Marc Titinger <mtitinger@baylibre.com> - 2015-11-12 11:20 +0100
Re: [RFC 4/4] iio: ina2xx: add SOFTWARE buffer mode using an iio kfifo. Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de> - 2015-11-12 11:30 +0100
Re: [RFC 4/4] iio: ina2xx: add SOFTWARE buffer mode using an iio kfifo. Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> - 2015-11-14 19:50 +0100
Re: [RFC 4/4] iio: ina2xx: add SOFTWARE buffer mode using an iio kfifo. Marc Titinger <mtitinger@baylibre.com> - 2015-11-16 10:40 +0100
[RFC 2/4] iio: ina2xx: add SAMP_FREQ attribute. Marc Titinger <mtitinger@baylibre.com> - 2015-11-10 17:10 +0100
Re: [RFC 2/4] iio: ina2xx: add SAMP_FREQ attribute. Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@gmail.com> - 2015-11-11 11:20 +0100
csiph-web