Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1267264
| From | Gratian Crisan <gratian.crisan@ni.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH] tsc: synchronize TSCs on buggy Intel Xeon E5 CPUs with offset error |
| Date | 2015-11-11 17:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qtFYu-4IH-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <qt2Nt-4hc-33@gated-at.bofh.it> <qtlQ6-9M-31@gated-at.bofh.it> <qtlQ6-9M-29@gated-at.bofh.it> <qtn5w-Uo-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <qto1A-1vO-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Josh Hunt writes:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Gratian Crisan <gratian.crisan@ni.com> wrote:
>>
>> The observed behavior does seem to match BT81 errata i.e. the TSC does
>> not get reset on warm reboots and it is otherwise stable.
>>
> If you have a simple testcase to reproduce the problem I'd be
> interested in seeing it.
We have first hit this bug on a 4.1 PREEMPT_RT kernel where it actually
causes a boot hang on warm reboots. I haven't quite got to the bottom of
why the TSC having a large offset vs. CPU0 would cause the hang yet. I
have some stack traces around somewhere I can dig up.
I also wrote a small C utility[1], with a bit of code borrowed from the
kernel, for reading the TSC on all CPUs. It starts a high priority
thread per CPU, tries to synchronize them and prints out the TSC values
and their offset with regards to CPU0.
It can be called from a SysV init shell script[2] at the beginning of
the boot process and right before a reboot to save the values in a file.
I've pasted the results after 3 reboots [3]. You can see the CPU0's TSC
getting reset on reboot and the other cores happily ticking on throughout
the reboot.
-Gratian
[1] read-tsc.c
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
#define _GNU_SOURCE
#include <unistd.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <stdint.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <pthread.h>
#include <sched.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <assert.h>
#define DECLARE_ARGS(val, low, high) unsigned low, high
#define EAX_EDX_VAL(val, low, high) ((low) | ((uint64_t)(high) << 32))
#define EAX_EDX_ARGS(val, low, high) "a" (low), "d" (high)
#define EAX_EDX_RET(val, low, high) "=a" (low), "=d" (high)
static int thread_sync;
static unsigned long long *tsc_data = NULL;
#define ACCESS_ONCE(x) (*(volatile typeof(x) *)&(x))
static inline void rep_nop(void)
{
asm volatile("rep; nop" ::: "memory");
}
static inline void cpu_relax(void)
{
rep_nop();
}
static inline unsigned long long rdtsc_ordered(void)
{
DECLARE_ARGS(val, low, high);
asm volatile("lfence" : : : "memory");
asm volatile("rdtsc" : EAX_EDX_RET(val, low, high));
return EAX_EDX_VAL(val, low, high);
}
static void* threadfn(void *param)
{
long cpu = (long)param;
cpu_set_t mask;
struct sched_param schedp;
CPU_ZERO(&mask);
CPU_SET(cpu, &mask);
if (sched_setaffinity(0, sizeof(mask), &mask) == -1) {
perror("error: Failed to set the CPU affinity");
return NULL;
}
/*
* Set the thread priority just below the migration thread's. The idea
* is to minimize the chances of being preempted while running the test.
*/
memset(&schedp, 0, sizeof(schedp));
schedp.sched_priority = sched_get_priority_max(SCHED_FIFO) - 1;
if (sched_setscheduler(0, SCHED_FIFO, &schedp) == -1) {
perror("error: Failed to set the thread priority");
return NULL;
}
__sync_sub_and_fetch(&thread_sync, 1);
while (ACCESS_ONCE(thread_sync))
cpu_relax();
tsc_data[cpu] = rdtsc_ordered();
return NULL;
}
int main(int argc, char* argv[])
{
long i;
unsigned long n_cpus;
pthread_t *th = NULL;
int ret = EXIT_SUCCESS;
n_cpus = sysconf(_SC_NPROCESSORS_ONLN);
thread_sync = n_cpus;
__sync_synchronize();
tsc_data = (unsigned long long*)malloc(n_cpus *
sizeof(unsigned long long));
if (!tsc_data) {
fprintf(stderr, "error: Failed to allocate memory for TSC data\n");
ret = EXIT_FAILURE;
goto out;
}
th = (pthread_t *)malloc(n_cpus * sizeof(pthread_t));
if (!th) {
fprintf(stderr, "error: Failed to allocate memory for thread data\n");
ret = EXIT_FAILURE;
goto out;
}
for (i = 0; i < n_cpus; i++)
pthread_create(&th[i], NULL, threadfn, (void*)i);
for (i = 0; i < n_cpus; i++)
pthread_join(th[i], NULL);
if (argc > 1)
printf("%s: ", argv[1]);
for (i = 0; i < n_cpus; i++)
printf("%llu[%lld] ", tsc_data[i], tsc_data[i] - tsc_data[0]);
printf("\n");
out:
free(tsc_data);
free(th);
return ret;
}
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
[2] /etc/init.d/save-tsc
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
#!/bin/sh
read-tsc "$1" >> /tsc.dat
exit 0
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
[3] tsc.dat
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
stop: 222292260504[0] 146566095145777[146343802885273] 146566095145866[146343802885362] 146566095145817[146343802885313] 146566095145895[146343802885391] 146566095145840[146343802885336] 146566095145751[146343802885247] 146566095145707[146343802885203]
start: 42437383741[0] 146626054987730[146583617603989] 146626054987813[146583617604072] 146626054987873[146583617604132] 146626054987444[146583617603703] 146626054987557[146583617603816] 146626054987703[146583617603962] 146626054987922[146583617604181]
stop: 175075718467[0] 146758693322318[146583617603851] 146758693322251[146583617603784] 146758693322294[146583617603827] 146758693322276[146583617603809] 146758693322197[146583617603730] 146758693322228[146583617603761] 146758693322116[146583617603649]
start: 42318111746[0] 146818573335855[146776255224109] 146818573336118[146776255224372] 146818573335988[146776255224242] 146818573335796[146776255224050] 146818573335930[146776255224184] 146818573335738[146776255223992] 146818573335619[146776255223873]
stop: 117186647162[0] 146893441871380[146776255224218] 146893441871412[146776255224250] 146893441871361[146776255224199] 146893441871287[146776255224125] 146893441871335[146776255224173] 146893441871439[146776255224277] 146893441871269[146776255224107]
start: 42577639385[0] 146953539519284[146910961879899] 146953539519333[146910961879948] 146953539519268[146910961879883] 146953539536718[146910961897333] 146953539519223[146910961879838] 146953539519068[146910961879683] 146953539519185[146910961879800]
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC PATCH] tsc: synchronize TSCs on buggy Intel Xeon E5 CPUs with offset error gratian.crisan@ni.com - 2015-11-09 21:10 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH] tsc: synchronize TSCs on buggy Intel Xeon E5 CPUs with offset error Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-11-09 23:10 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH] tsc: synchronize TSCs on buggy Intel Xeon E5 CPUs with offset error Josh Hunt <joshhunt00@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 19:30 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH] tsc: synchronize TSCs on buggy Intel Xeon E5 CPUs with offset error Gratian Crisan <gratian.crisan@ni.com> - 2015-11-10 20:50 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH] tsc: synchronize TSCs on buggy Intel Xeon E5 CPUs with offset error Josh Hunt <joshhunt00@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 21:50 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH] tsc: synchronize TSCs on buggy Intel Xeon E5 CPUs with offset error Gratian Crisan <gratian.crisan@ni.com> - 2015-11-11 17:00 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH] tsc: synchronize TSCs on buggy Intel Xeon E5 CPUs with offset error Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-11-13 21:50 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH] tsc: synchronize TSCs on buggy Intel Xeon E5 CPUs with offset error Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> - 2015-11-13 22:20 +0100
csiph-web