Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1265487
| From | Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/2] mmc: sdhci: potentially bad behavior when using vmmc supply |
| Date | 2015-11-09 10:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qsR5E-4AF-39@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qrRAL-6pR-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <qrSn7-6Y7-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qsPnb-3rE-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[...] >> > Is the regulator-gpio usage the right thing to do for vqmmc? In my case it is >> > not really driven by a gpio but by a pio from the sdhci device. In the binding, >> >> What's a "pio"? >> >> What do you mean by the it's driven from the sdhci device? >> > > Sorry I mean sdhci device from the SoC point of view, I should say > controller. So yes the signal is driven by the controller. > >> Is it the internal HW logic of the sdhci controller that manages the >> IO voltage? And this logic can be controlled via certain register bits >> in the SDHCI controller? >> > > Yes, it depends of the value of the '1.8V Signaling Enable' value in the > host control 2 register. > >> > declaring the gpio is an option so I thought using this regulator fits my need. >> >> In quite many cases it makes sense to model this though a gpio >> regulator. For example when you use a level shifter circuit. Those >> normally have gpio pin routed to control the voltage level output for >> the signals. For example switching between 1.8V and 2.9V. >> > > I agree, my concern is to know if I can consider it as a 'general' pio > since it is driven by the sdhci controller. This doesn't seems like a case where a gpio regulator should be used and I am not sure what problem it would solve. Beside to suppress the log warnings (actually those aren't warnings but informations). Isn't sdhci_do_start_signal_voltage_switch() doing what you need here? Kind regards Uffe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 0/2] mmc: sdhci: potentially bad behavior when using vmmc supply Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com> - 2015-11-06 17:00 +0100
[PATCH 1/2] mmc: sdhci: set bus voltage before enabling bus power Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com> - 2015-11-06 17:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/2] mmc: sdhci: set bus voltage before enabling bus power Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com> - 2015-11-09 14:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/2] mmc: sdhci: set bus voltage before enabling bus power Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> - 2015-11-09 15:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/2] mmc: sdhci: set bus voltage before enabling bus power Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com> - 2015-11-09 15:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/2] mmc: sdhci: set bus voltage before enabling bus power Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> - 2015-11-09 17:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/2] mmc: sdhci: set bus voltage before enabling bus power Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com> - 2015-11-09 17:40 +0100
[PATCH 2/2] ARM: at91/dt: sama5d2 Xplained: add regulators for sdhci devices Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com> - 2015-11-06 17:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 0/2] mmc: sdhci: potentially bad behavior when using vmmc supply Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> - 2015-11-06 17:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 0/2] mmc: sdhci: potentially bad behavior when using vmmc supply Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com> - 2015-11-09 08:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 0/2] mmc: sdhci: potentially bad behavior when using vmmc supply Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> - 2015-11-09 10:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 0/2] mmc: sdhci: potentially bad behavior when using vmmc supply Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com> - 2015-11-09 11:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 0/2] mmc: sdhci: potentially bad behavior when using vmmc supply Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> - 2015-11-09 12:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 0/2] mmc: sdhci: potentially bad behavior when using vmmc supply Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com> - 2015-11-09 14:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 0/2] mmc: sdhci: potentially bad behavior when using vmmc supply Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> - 2015-11-09 14:20 +0100
csiph-web