Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1265230

Re: [PATCH] arm64: bpf: fix JIT stack setup

From Z Lim <zlim.lnx@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH] arm64: bpf: fix JIT stack setup
Date 2015-11-08 23:40 +0100
Message-ID <qsGMW-6dI-23@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qs4HF-6ER-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <qsnTY-2aP-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 6:27 PM, Alexei Starovoitov
<alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 09:36:17PM -0800, Yang Shi wrote:
>> ARM64 JIT used FP (x29) as eBPF fp register, but FP is subjected to
>> change during function call so it may cause the BPF prog stack base address
>> change too. Whenever, it pointed to the bottom of BPF prog stack instead of
>> the top.
>>
>> So, when copying data via bpf_probe_read, it will be copied to (SP - offset),
>> then it may overwrite the saved FP/LR.
>>
>> Use x25 to replace FP as BPF stack base register (fp). Since x25 is callee
>> saved register, so it will keep intact during function call.
>> It is initialized in BPF prog prologue when BPF prog is started to run
>> everytime. When BPF prog exits, it could be just tossed.
>>
>> Other than this the BPf prog stack base need to be setup before function
>> call stack.
>>
>> So, the BPF stack layout looks like:
>>
>>                                  high
>>          original A64_SP =>   0:+-----+ BPF prologue
>>                                 |     | FP/LR and callee saved registers
>>          BPF fp register => +64:+-----+
>>                                 |     |
>>                                 | ... | BPF prog stack
>>                                 |     |
>>                                 |     |
>>          current A64_SP =>      +-----+
>>                                 |     |
>>                                 | ... | Function call stack
>>                                 |     |
>>                                 +-----+
>>                                   low
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linaro.org>
>> CC: Zi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@gmail.com>
>> CC: Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com>
>
> Thanks for tracking it down.
> That looks like fundamental bug in arm64 jit. I'm surprised function calls worked at all.
> Zi please review.
>

For function calls (BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL), we are compliant with AAPCS64
[1]. That part is okay.


bpf_probe_read accesses the BPF program stack, which is based on BPF_REG_FP.

This exposes an issue with how BPF_REG_FP was setup, as Yang pointed out.
Instead of having BPF_REG_FP point to top of stack, we erroneously
point it to the bottom of stack. When there are function calls, we run
the risk of clobbering of BPF stack. Bad idea.

Otherwise, since BPF_REG_FP is read-only, and is setup exactly once in
prologue, it remains consistent throughout lifetime of the BPF
program.


Yang, can you please try the following?

8<-----
--- a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -161,12 +161,12 @@ static void build_prologue(struct jit_ctx *ctx)
        if (ctx->tmp_used)
                emit(A64_PUSH(tmp1, tmp2, A64_SP), ctx);

-       /* Set up BPF stack */
-       emit(A64_SUB_I(1, A64_SP, A64_SP, stack_size), ctx);
-
        /* Set up frame pointer */
        emit(A64_MOV(1, fp, A64_SP), ctx);

+       /* Set up BPF stack */
+       emit(A64_SUB_I(1, A64_SP, A64_SP, stack_size), ctx);
+
        /* Clear registers A and X */
        emit_a64_mov_i64(ra, 0, ctx);
        emit_a64_mov_i64(rx, 0, ctx);
----->8

[1] http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.ihi0055b/IHI0055B_aapcs64.pdf
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH] arm64: bpf: fix JIT stack setup Yang Shi <yang.shi@linaro.org> - 2015-11-07 07:00 +0100
  Re: [PATCH] arm64: bpf: fix JIT stack setup Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> - 2015-11-08 03:30 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] arm64: bpf: fix JIT stack setup Z Lim <zlim.lnx@gmail.com> - 2015-11-08 23:40 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] arm64: bpf: fix JIT stack setup "Shi, Yang" <yang.shi@linaro.org> - 2015-11-09 19:10 +0100
        Re: [PATCH] arm64: bpf: fix JIT stack setup Z Lim <zlim.lnx@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 21:10 +0100
          Re: [PATCH] arm64: bpf: fix JIT stack setup "Shi, Yang" <yang.shi@linaro.org> - 2015-11-10 20:50 +0100
            Re: [PATCH] arm64: bpf: fix JIT stack setup Z Lim <zlim.lnx@gmail.com> - 2015-11-11 04:20 +0100

csiph-web