Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1263723
| From | Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] thermal: mediatek: Add cpu power cooling model. |
| Date | 2015-11-06 04:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qrFSV-7wi-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qmmQW-1Wt-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <qmmQX-1Wt-43@gated-at.bofh.it> <qrcee-4Ne-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <qrqKf-5R7-37@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Cc'ing Javi (which you should have as he wrote the power-thing for cpu-cooling). On 05-11-15, 19:10, dawei chien wrote: > This is because our platform currently only support mt8173_cpufreq.c, so > that I only add static power model for our owner IC. Bindings are (normally) supposed to be general than a platform specific. > Please understanding that I wouldn't give a DT binding document since I > will remove static power table on next version, but I can try to explain > it. Then just don't add things in the first place. > As far as I know, static power is somewhat leakage of CPU clusters, so > that we hardly to find a formula, which can suitable all kinds of CPUs > since leakage is different. In ARM IPA framework, static power only need > to be defined by who register cpufreq_power_cooling_register. The > voltage/power table is just one way to present leakage power of CPUs. The bindings don't fix the values for static power, but just provides a field for platforms to use. Everyone can then send its own power figures. Why do you thing it can't be generalized? > Actually, static power is optional since dynamic power is much more than > static power. Maybe, we should still capture it. @Javi ? -- viresh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] thermal: mediatek: Add cpu power cooling model. Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 20:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] thermal: mediatek: Add cpu power cooling model. dawei chien <dawei.chien@mediatek.com> - 2015-11-05 12:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] thermal: mediatek: Add cpu power cooling model. Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2015-11-06 04:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] thermal: mediatek: Add cpu power cooling model. Javi Merino <javi.merino@arm.com> - 2015-11-10 12:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] thermal: mediatek: Add cpu power cooling model. Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 19:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] thermal: mediatek: Add cpu power cooling model. Javi Merino <javi.merino@arm.com> - 2015-11-11 10:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] thermal: mediatek: Add cpu power cooling model. Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2015-11-13 06:10 +0100
csiph-web