Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1261691

Re: [PATCH] ssb: mark ssb_bus_register as __maybe_unused

From Michael Büsch <m@bues.ch>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH] ssb: mark ssb_bus_register as __maybe_unused
Date 2015-11-03 17:30 +0100
Message-ID <qqMD8-5cu-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qqLxp-4or-31@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Tue, 03 Nov 2015 16:05:51 +0100
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:

> The SoC variant of the ssb code is now optional like the other
> ones, which means we can build the framwork without any
> front-end, but that results in a warning:
> 
> drivers/ssb/main.c:616:12: warning: 'ssb_bus_register' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
> 
> This annotates the ssb_bus_register function as __maybe_unused to
> shut up the warning. A configuration like this will not work on
> any hardware of course, but we still want this to silently build
> without warnings if the configuration is allowed in the first
> place.


Is there a simple way to disallow this configuration?

-- 
Michael

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH] ssb: mark ssb_bus_register as __maybe_unused Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2015-11-03 16:20 +0100
  [PATCH] ARM: at91/defconfig: remove CONFIG_SSB from Atmel defconfigs Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> - 2015-11-03 17:00 +0100
  Re: [PATCH] ssb: mark ssb_bus_register as __maybe_unused Michael Büsch <m@bues.ch> - 2015-11-03 17:30 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] ssb: mark ssb_bus_register as __maybe_unused Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2015-11-03 17:50 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] ssb: mark ssb_bus_register as __maybe_unused Michael Büsch <m@bues.ch> - 2015-11-03 18:00 +0100

csiph-web