Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1259501
| From | Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | [PATCH 0/3] PM, vfs: use filesystem freezing instead of kthread freezer |
| Date | 2015-10-30 14:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qpie5-6qe-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
This series is a followup to my proposal I brought up on Kernel Summit in Seoul. Noone seemed to had any principal objections, so let's have wider audience look into it. In a nuthsell: freezing of kernel threads is horrible interface with unclear semantics and guarantees, and I am surprised it ever worked properly. Plus there are a lot of places that simply use it in a completely wrong way (which is not suprising, given the lack of defined semantics and requirements). I've tested this over a series of suspend/resume cycles on several machines with at least ext4, btrfs and xfs, and it survived the testing without any harm. Patch 1/3 implements the actual change, and has a more detailed explanation on "why?" and "how?" questions in the changelog Patch 2/3 nukes all (hopefully) the calls to freezer from kthreads in Linus' tree (as of 858e904bd71) Patch 3/3 introduces WARN_ON() if anyone is trying to make use of this again Open questions / discussion points: - is the way I am traversing list of superblocks backwards enough to guarantee correct ordering? Especially: does this work as intended for FUSE? - should freezable workqueues be dealt with the same way? I haven't even started to look into them in a serious way, but it seems like the drivers that are making use of them would actually like to use proper PM callbacks instead -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 0/3] PM, vfs: use filesystem freezing instead of kthread freezer Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> - 2015-10-30 14:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 0/3] PM, vfs: use filesystem freezing instead of kthread freezer Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2015-10-30 16:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 0/3] PM, vfs: use filesystem freezing instead of kthread freezer Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> - 2015-10-30 18:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 0/3] PM, vfs: use filesystem freezing instead of kthread freezer Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> - 2015-10-30 20:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 0/3] PM, vfs: use filesystem freezing instead of kthread freezer Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2015-10-30 21:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 0/3] PM, vfs: use filesystem freezing instead of kthread freezer Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> - 2015-10-30 22:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 0/3] PM, vfs: use filesystem freezing instead of kthread freezer "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2015-10-31 03:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 0/3] PM, vfs: use filesystem freezing instead of kthread freezer Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> - 2015-10-31 09:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 0/3] PM, vfs: use filesystem freezing instead of kthread freezer "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2015-11-02 03:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 0/3] PM, vfs: use filesystem freezing instead of kthread freezer Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> - 2015-11-02 11:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 0/3] PM, vfs: use filesystem freezing instead of kthread freezer Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com> - 2015-11-02 12:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 0/3] PM, vfs: use filesystem freezing instead of kthread freezer Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2015-11-02 16:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 0/3] PM, vfs: use filesystem freezing instead of kthread freezer Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> - 2015-11-03 01:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 0/3] PM, vfs: use filesystem freezing instead of kthread freezer "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2015-11-03 04:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 0/3] PM, vfs: use filesystem freezing instead of kthread freezer Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> - 2015-11-03 10:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 0/3] PM, vfs: use filesystem freezing instead of kthread freezer "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2015-11-03 22:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 0/3] PM, vfs: use filesystem freezing instead of kthread freezer Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2015-10-31 17:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 0/3] PM, vfs: use filesystem freezing instead of kthread freezer Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2015-10-31 17:00 +0100
csiph-web