Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1261176
| From | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/3] PM, vfs: use filesystem freezing instead of kthread freezer |
| Date | 2015-11-03 04:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qqABY-5Gc-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qpoMx-22G-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <qqcSZ-7Vo-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <qqxuq-3IW-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tuesday, November 03, 2015 11:10:53 AM Dave Chinner wrote: > On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 03:43:07AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > I guess it may also helps to address the case when a device is removed from a > > suspended system, written to on another system in the meantime and inserted > > back into the (still suspended) original system which then is resumed. Today > > this is an almost guaranteed data corruption scenario, but if the filesystem in > > question is properly frozen during suspend, the driver should be able to detect > > superblock changes during unfreeze. > > Never going to work. There is no guarantee that a write to a > filesystem by a third party device is going to change the superblock > (or any metadata in the rest of the filesystem) in any detectable > way. Hence freezing filesystems will not prevent Bad Things > Happening if you do this while your system is suspended. OK, thanks for the clarification. Cheers, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH 0/3] PM, vfs: use filesystem freezing instead of kthread freezer "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2015-11-02 03:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 0/3] PM, vfs: use filesystem freezing instead of kthread freezer Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> - 2015-11-02 11:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 0/3] PM, vfs: use filesystem freezing instead of kthread freezer Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com> - 2015-11-02 12:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 0/3] PM, vfs: use filesystem freezing instead of kthread freezer Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2015-11-02 16:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 0/3] PM, vfs: use filesystem freezing instead of kthread freezer Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> - 2015-11-03 01:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 0/3] PM, vfs: use filesystem freezing instead of kthread freezer "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2015-11-03 04:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 0/3] PM, vfs: use filesystem freezing instead of kthread freezer Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> - 2015-11-03 10:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 0/3] PM, vfs: use filesystem freezing instead of kthread freezer "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2015-11-03 22:40 +0100
csiph-web