Re: Silent hang up caused by pages being not scanned?

From	Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: Silent hang up caused by pages being not scanned?
Date	2015-10-19 15:00 +0200
Message-ID	<qlicG-4P7-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	(1 earlier) <qjaMi-3HR-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <qjQBR-7uU-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <qkfAe-2um-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <qki54-6bZ-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <qkieK-6nN-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Sat 17-10-15 03:49:39, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > Tetsuo, mind trying it out and maybe tweaking it a bit for the load
> > you have? Does it seem to improve on your situation?
> 
> Yes, I already tried it and just replied to Michal.
> 
> I tested for one hour using various memory stressing programs.
> As far as I tested, I did not hit silent hang up (

Thank you for your testing!

[...]

> Only problem I felt is that the ratio of inactive_file/writeback
> (shown below) was high (compared to shown above) when I did

Yes this is the lack of congestion on the bdi as Linus expected.
Another patch I've just posted should help in that regards. At least it
seems to help in my testing.

[...]

> I can still hit OOM livelock (
> 
>  MemAlloc-Info: X stalling task, Y dying task, Z victim task.
> 
> where X > 0 && Y > 0).

This seems a separate issue, though.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Silent hang up caused by pages being not scanned? Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2015-10-19 15:00 +0200

csiph-web