Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1248938
| From | David Ahern <dsa@cumulusnetworks.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] ipv6: no addrconf for slave devices |
| Date | 2015-10-16 18:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qkfJU-2V2-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qkaqT-3p4-41@gated-at.bofh.it> <qkbPY-5nh-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <qkfAe-2um-29@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 10/16/15 9:57 AM, Jan Blunck wrote: > > I don't think that enslaved ports should get network layer addresses. > This is one example with a team device: for VRF devices we do want the enslaved links to have link local addresses. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] ipv6: no addrconf for slave devices Jan Blunck <jblunck@infradead.org> - 2015-10-16 12:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] ipv6: no addrconf for slave devices Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> - 2015-10-16 14:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] ipv6: no addrconf for slave devices Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> - 2015-10-16 14:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] ipv6: no addrconf for slave devices Jan Blunck <jblunck@infradead.org> - 2015-10-16 18:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] ipv6: no addrconf for slave devices David Ahern <dsa@cumulusnetworks.com> - 2015-10-16 18:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] ipv6: no addrconf for slave devices Jan Blunck <jblunck@infradead.org> - 2015-10-16 18:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] ipv6: no addrconf for slave devices David Ahern <dsa@cumulusnetworks.com> - 2015-10-16 18:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] ipv6: no addrconf for slave devices Jan Blunck <jblunck@infradead.org> - 2015-10-16 18:40 +0200
csiph-web