Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1247609

Re: [PATCH 4/5] x86/setup/crash: Check memblock_reserve() retval

From Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 4/5] x86/setup/crash: Check memblock_reserve() retval
Date 2015-10-15 11:30 +0200
Message-ID <qjN1g-2cP-17@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qjM5c-QH-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <qjM5c-QH-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 10/15/15 at 10:20am, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> From: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
> 
> memblock_reserve() can fail but the crashkernel reservation code
> doesn't check that and this can lead the user into believing that the
> crashkernel region was actually reserved. Make sure we check that return
> value and we exit early with a failure message in the error case.
> 
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
> Cc: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
> Cc: jerry_hoemann@hp.com
> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
> Cc: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
> Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
> Cc: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: WANG Chao <chaowang@redhat.com>
> Cc: x86-ml <x86@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 12 ++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
> index d4788719a1e2..3f75297d5fd0 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
> @@ -531,7 +531,11 @@ static int __init reserve_crashkernel_low(void)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  	}
>  
> -	memblock_reserve(low_base, low_size);
> +	ret = memblock_reserve(low_base, low_size);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		pr_err("%s: Error reserving crashkernel low memblock.\n", __func__);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
>  

Seems there's no checking for other callback to memblock_reserve in setup.c
Need another cleanup?

BTW, a further cleanup is reasonable to me, there's a lot of below patter:
memblock_find_in_range
error checking
memblock_reserve
error checking

So a new function memblock_reserve_in_range is reasonable.

Thanks
Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH 4/5] x86/setup/crash: Check memblock_reserve() retval Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2015-10-15 10:30 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 4/5] x86/setup/crash: Check memblock_reserve() retval Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com> - 2015-10-15 11:30 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 4/5] x86/setup/crash: Check memblock_reserve() retval Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2015-10-15 12:10 +0200

csiph-web