Re: [PATCH 0/2] atm: iphase: Fix misleading indention and return -ENOMEM on error

From	"Charles (Chas) Williams" <3chas3@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH 0/2] atm: iphase: Fix misleading indention and return -ENOMEM on error
Date	2015-10-12 17:30 +0200
Message-ID	<qiNcZ-2Xu-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<qi8jw-2fO-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Sat, 2015-10-10 at 21:47 +0200, Tillmann Heidsieck wrote:
> this series fixes two of them. The if(); warning would require
> restructuring the code to a larger extend. Beyond this there remains a
> whooping number of > 2k checkpatch.pl warnings and errors each. Those
> can be grouped into 
...
> Generally I would not mind cleaning all this up for those who have to
> make functional changes to the driver. However, I would like to know
> from the maintainers if such an afford would be welcome or not.

It doesn't bother me if you do this.  I can review it.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[PATCH 0/2] atm: iphase: Fix misleading indention and return -ENOMEM on error Tillmann Heidsieck <theidsieck@leenox.de> - 2015-10-10 21:50 +0200
  [PATCH 1/2] atm: iphase: return -ENOMEM instead of -1 in case of failed kmalloc() Tillmann Heidsieck <theidsieck@leenox.de> - 2015-10-10 21:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 1/2] atm: iphase: return -ENOMEM instead of -1 in case  of failed kmalloc() David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> - 2015-10-13 04:50 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 0/2] atm: iphase: Fix misleading indention and return  -ENOMEM on error "Charles (Chas) Williams" <3chas3@gmail.com> - 2015-10-12 17:30 +0200

csiph-web