Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1238300
| From | Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH -mm v2 1/3] mm/oom_kill: remove the wrong fatal_signal_pending() check in oom_kill_process() |
| Date | 2015-10-02 16:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qf92t-5aj-61@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <qeNXY-6n-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <qeOhj-t3-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <qeOKm-1gw-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <qeQj8-3kO-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <qf6QW-26b-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Tetsuo, sorry, I don't understand your question...
On 10/02, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
>
> Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > On 10/01, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > >
> > > zap_process will add SIGKILL to all threads but the
> > > current which will go on without being killed and if this is not a
> > > thread group leader then we would miss it.
> >
> > Yes. And note that de_thread() does the same. Speaking of oom-killer
> > this is mostly fine, the execing thread is going to release its old
> > ->mm and it has already passed the copy_strings() stage which can use
> > a lot more memory.
>
> So, we have the same wrong fatal_signal_pending() check in out_of_memory()
Yes, sure, it is not right too. Again, this is even documented in
d003f371b27016354c:
fatal_signal_pending() can be true because of SIGNAL_GROUP_COREDUMP so
out_of_memory() and mem_cgroup_out_of_memory() shouldn't blindly trust it.
This is off-topic in a sense that this series only tries to ensure that
if we are going to kill a memory hog we can't miss a process which shares
the same mm (ignoring the OOM_SCORE_ADJ_MIN condition below).
> /*
> * If current has a pending SIGKILL or is exiting, then automatically
> * select it. The goal is to allow it to allocate so that it may
> * quickly exit and free its memory.
> *
> * But don't select if current has already released its mm and cleared
> * TIF_MEMDIE flag at exit_mm(), otherwise an OOM livelock may occur.
> */
> if (current->mm &&
> (fatal_signal_pending(current) || task_will_free_mem(current))) {
> mark_oom_victim(current);
> return true;
> }
>
> because it is possible that T starts the coredump, T sends SIGKILL to P,
> P calls out_of_memory() on GFP_FS allocation,
yes, and since fatal_signal_pending() == T we do not even check
task_will_free_mem().
> P misses to set SIGKILL on T?
>
> Since T sends SIGKILL to all clone(CLONE_VM) tasks upon coredump, P needs
> to do
>
> [...snip...]
> after mark_oom_victim(current) in case T is not in the same thread group?
I do not see how this depends on "not in the same thread group". This
fatal_signal_pending() doesn't look right in any case.
> If yes, what happens if some task failed to receive SIGKILL due to
> p->signal->oom_score_adj == OOM_SCORE_ADJ_MIN condition?
Oh. This is another issue. I already tried to suggest to remove this
check. But this needs more discussion, hopefully we can do this later.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH -mm v2 1/3] mm/oom_kill: remove the wrong fatal_signal_pending() check in oom_kill_process() Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2015-09-30 20:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH -mm v2 1/3] mm/oom_kill: remove the wrong fatal_signal_pending()check in oom_kill_process() Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> - 2015-10-01 13:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH -mm v2 1/3] mm/oom_kill: remove the wrong fatal_signal_pending() check in oom_kill_process() Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2015-10-01 14:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH -mm v2 1/3] mm/oom_kill: remove the wrong fatal_signal_pending() check in oom_kill_process() Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2015-10-01 17:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH -mm v2 1/3] mm/oom_kill: remove the wrong fatal_signal_pending() check in oom_kill_process() Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2015-10-01 17:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH -mm v2 1/3] mm/oom_kill: remove the wrong fatal_signal_pending() check in oom_kill_process() Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2015-10-01 17:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH -mm v2 1/3] mm/oom_kill: remove the wrong fatal_signal_pending() check in oom_kill_process() Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2015-10-01 18:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH -mm v2 1/3] mm/oom_kill: remove the wrong fatal_signal_pending() check in oom_kill_process() Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2015-10-01 20:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH -mm v2 1/3] mm/oom_kill: remove the wrong fatal_signal_pending() check in oom_kill_process() Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> - 2015-10-02 13:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH -mm v2 1/3] mm/oom_kill: remove the wrong fatal_signal_pending() check in oom_kill_process() Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2015-10-02 14:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH -mm v2 1/3] mm/oom_kill: remove the wrong fatal_signal_pending() check in oom_kill_process() Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> - 2015-10-02 14:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH -mm v2 1/3] mm/oom_kill: remove the wrong fatal_signal_pending() check in oom_kill_process() Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2015-10-02 15:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH -mm v2 1/3] mm/oom_kill: remove the wrong fatal_signal_pending() check in oom_kill_process() Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> - 2015-10-02 16:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH -mm v2 1/3] mm/oom_kill: remove the wrong fatal_signal_pending() check in oom_kill_process() Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2015-10-02 16:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH -mm v2 1/3] mm/oom_kill: remove the wrong fatal_signal_pending() check in oom_kill_process() Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2015-10-02 16:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH -mm v2 1/3] mm/oom_kill: remove the wrong fatal_signal_pending() check in oom_kill_process() Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2015-10-02 16:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH -mm v2 1/3] mm/oom_kill: remove the wrong fatal_signal_pending() check in oom_kill_process() Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2015-10-02 16:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH -mm v2 1/3] mm/oom_kill: remove the wrong fatal_signal_pending() check in oom_kill_process() Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> - 2015-10-02 16:40 +0200
csiph-web