Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1238134

Re: [PATCH -mm v2 1/3] mm/oom_kill: remove the wrong fatal_signal_pending() check in oom_kill_process()

Show all headers | View raw

Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 10/01, Michal Hocko wrote:
> >
> > zap_process will add SIGKILL to all threads but the
> > current which will go on without being killed and if this is not a
> > thread group leader then we would miss it.
> 
> Yes. And note that de_thread() does the same. Speaking of oom-killer
> this is mostly fine, the execing thread is going to release its old
> ->mm and it has already passed the copy_strings() stage which can use
> a lot more memory.

So, we have the same wrong fatal_signal_pending() check in out_of_memory()

        /*
         * If current has a pending SIGKILL or is exiting, then automatically
         * select it.  The goal is to allow it to allocate so that it may
         * quickly exit and free its memory.
         *
         * But don't select if current has already released its mm and cleared
         * TIF_MEMDIE flag at exit_mm(), otherwise an OOM livelock may occur.
         */
        if (current->mm &&
            (fatal_signal_pending(current) || task_will_free_mem(current))) {
                mark_oom_victim(current);
                return true;
        }

because it is possible that T starts the coredump, T sends SIGKILL to P,
P calls out_of_memory() on GFP_FS allocation, P misses to set SIGKILL on T?

Since T sends SIGKILL to all clone(CLONE_VM) tasks upon coredump, P needs
to do

        rcu_read_lock();
        for_each_process(p) {
                if (!process_shares_mm(p, current->mm))
                        continue;
                if (unlikely(p->flags & PF_KTHREAD))
                        continue;
                if (p->signal->oom_score_adj == OOM_SCORE_ADJ_MIN)
                        continue;

                do_send_sig_info(SIGKILL, SEND_SIG_FORCED, p, true);
        }
        rcu_read_unlock();

after mark_oom_victim(current) in case T is not in the same thread group?

If yes, what happens if some task failed to receive SIGKILL due to
p->signal->oom_score_adj == OOM_SCORE_ADJ_MIN condition?
Will we hit mm->mmap_sem livelock?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[PATCH -mm v2 1/3] mm/oom_kill: remove the wrong  fatal_signal_pending() check in oom_kill_process() Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2015-09-30 20:30 +0200
  Re: [PATCH -mm v2 1/3] mm/oom_kill: remove the wrong fatal_signal_pending()check in oom_kill_process() Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> - 2015-10-01 13:00 +0200
  Re: [PATCH -mm v2 1/3] mm/oom_kill: remove the wrong  fatal_signal_pending() check in oom_kill_process() Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2015-10-01 14:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH -mm v2 1/3] mm/oom_kill: remove the wrong  fatal_signal_pending() check in oom_kill_process() Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2015-10-01 17:10 +0200
      Re: [PATCH -mm v2 1/3] mm/oom_kill: remove the wrong  fatal_signal_pending() check in oom_kill_process() Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2015-10-01 17:30 +0200
        Re: [PATCH -mm v2 1/3] mm/oom_kill: remove the wrong  fatal_signal_pending() check in oom_kill_process() Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2015-10-01 17:50 +0200
          Re: [PATCH -mm v2 1/3] mm/oom_kill: remove the wrong  fatal_signal_pending() check in oom_kill_process() Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2015-10-01 18:20 +0200
            Re: [PATCH -mm v2 1/3] mm/oom_kill: remove the wrong  fatal_signal_pending() check in oom_kill_process() Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2015-10-01 20:00 +0200
              Re: [PATCH -mm v2 1/3] mm/oom_kill: remove the wrong fatal_signal_pending() check in oom_kill_process() Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> - 2015-10-02 13:40 +0200
                Re: [PATCH -mm v2 1/3] mm/oom_kill: remove the wrong  fatal_signal_pending() check in oom_kill_process() Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2015-10-02 14:20 +0200
                Re: [PATCH -mm v2 1/3] mm/oom_kill: remove the wrong fatal_signal_pending() check in oom_kill_process() Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> - 2015-10-02 14:40 +0200
                Re: [PATCH -mm v2 1/3] mm/oom_kill: remove the wrong  fatal_signal_pending() check in oom_kill_process() Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2015-10-02 15:40 +0200
                Re: [PATCH -mm v2 1/3] mm/oom_kill: remove the wrong fatal_signal_pending() check in oom_kill_process() Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> - 2015-10-02 16:10 +0200
                Re: [PATCH -mm v2 1/3] mm/oom_kill: remove the wrong  fatal_signal_pending() check in oom_kill_process() Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2015-10-02 16:20 +0200
                Re: [PATCH -mm v2 1/3] mm/oom_kill: remove the wrong  fatal_signal_pending() check in oom_kill_process() Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2015-10-02 16:10 +0200
                Re: [PATCH -mm v2 1/3] mm/oom_kill: remove the wrong  fatal_signal_pending() check in oom_kill_process() Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2015-10-02 16:30 +0200
                Re: [PATCH -mm v2 1/3] mm/oom_kill: remove the wrong  fatal_signal_pending() check in oom_kill_process() Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2015-10-02 16:00 +0200
                Re: [PATCH -mm v2 1/3] mm/oom_kill: remove the wrong fatal_signal_pending() check in oom_kill_process() Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> - 2015-10-02 16:40 +0200

csiph-web