[RFC][PATCH v2 0/2] PM / sleep: Make it possible to check if suspend/resume goes via firmware

From	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	[RFC][PATCH v2 0/2] PM / sleep: Make it possible to check if suspend/resume goes via firmware
Date	2015-10-02 03:30 +0200
Message-ID	<qeXkB-5f4-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<qedrr-5yV-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Wednesday, September 30, 2015 02:46:10 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> Patch [1/2] introduces a new mechanism that can be used to check whether or not
> platform firmware is going to be involved in system suspend or was involved
> in system resume.

That's still the case, but patch [2/2] modifies the PCI PM layer and the general
ACPI PM domain only to use the mechanism added by the [1/2].

Comments welcome.

Thanks,
Rafael

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Thread

[RFC][PATCH 0/2] PM / sleep: Make it possible to check if suspend/resume goes via firmware "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2015-09-30 02:30 +0200
  [RFC][PATCH 1/2] PM / sleep: Add flags to indicate platform firmware involvement "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2015-09-30 02:30 +0200
  [RFC][PATCH v2 2/2] PM / PCI / ACPI: Kick devices that might have been reset by firmware "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2015-10-02 03:30 +0200
  [RFC][PATCH v2 0/2] PM / sleep: Make it possible to check if suspend/resume goes via firmware "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2015-10-02 03:30 +0200
    [RFC][PATCH v2 1/2] PM / sleep: Add flags to indicate platform firmware involvement "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2015-10-02 03:30 +0200

csiph-web