Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1228323
| From | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] Fix how CPUs are enumerated when there's more than 255 CPUs |
| Date | 2015-09-19 00:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qacaB-7wO-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <q6L6W-Ew-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <q6NV7-4H2-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <q6U0y-56Z-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wednesday, September 09, 2015 10:45:48 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Wednesday, September 09, 2015 03:47:27 PM Lukasz Anaczkowski wrote: > > This series of patches attempts to fix how CPUs are enumerated by kernel when > > there's more than 255 of them on single processor. > > In such case, BIOS may interleave APIC/X2APIC MADT subtables, to obey requirements > > specified in ACPI spec. Without this patches, kernel then would first enumerate > > BSP, then X2APIC then APIC, resulting in low APIC IDs to be assigned with high > > logical IDs and high APIC IDs to be assigned low logical IDs. Biggest consequence > > of that could be performance penalties due to wrong L2 cache sharing. > > More details in patch 2/2. > > > > Also, simpler approach has been considered, which did not required ACPI parsing > > interface changes, however it failed to meet requirements. More details can be > > found here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/9/7/285 > > > > Lukasz Anaczkowski (2): > > acpi: Added acpi_subtable_proc to ACPI table parsers > > x86, acpi: Handle apic/x2apic entries in MADT in correct order > > > > arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c | 22 +++++++++-- > > drivers/acpi/tables.c | 91 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- > > include/linux/acpi.h | 19 ++++++++-- > > 3 files changed, 107 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) > > OK > > Does anyone in the CC have any objections against merging this series? > > If not, I'll queue it up as 4.3-rc material. Well, I had a plan to push this for 4.3-rc2, but then I looked at it again and realized that I'd like it to stay in linux-next for a couple of weeks at least as I'm really unsure that it's not going to uncover some nastiness somewhere. Which practically means it's now scheduled for v4.4. Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH] x86, arm64, acpi: Handle lapic/x2apic entries in MADT Lukasz Anaczkowski <lukasz.anaczkowski@intel.com> - 2015-09-08 13:10 +0200
[PATCH 1/4] acpi: rename acpi_table_parse_entries Lukasz Anaczkowski <lukasz.anaczkowski@intel.com> - 2015-09-08 13:10 +0200
[PATCH 0/4] Fix how CPUs are enumerated when there's more than 255 CPUs Lukasz Anaczkowski <lukasz.anaczkowski@intel.com> - 2015-09-08 13:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/4] Fix how CPUs are enumerated when there's more than 255 CPUs Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2015-09-08 18:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/4] Fix how CPUs are enumerated when there's more than 255 CPUs Al Stone <ahs3@redhat.com> - 2015-09-09 00:50 +0200
RE: [PATCH 0/4] Fix how CPUs are enumerated when there's more than 255 CPUs "Anaczkowski, Lukasz" <lukasz.anaczkowski@intel.com> - 2015-09-09 09:10 +0200
[PATCH 1/2] acpi: Added acpi_subtable_proc to ACPI table parsers Lukasz Anaczkowski <lukasz.anaczkowski@intel.com> - 2015-09-09 11:40 +0200
[PATCH 2/2] x86, acpi: Handle apic/x2apic entries in MADT in correct order Lukasz Anaczkowski <lukasz.anaczkowski@intel.com> - 2015-09-09 11:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86, acpi: Handle apic/x2apic entries in MADT in correct order Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> - 2015-09-09 16:00 +0200
RE: [PATCH 2/2] x86, acpi: Handle apic/x2apic entries in MADT in correct order "Anaczkowski, Lukasz" <lukasz.anaczkowski@intel.com> - 2015-09-09 16:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86, acpi: Handle apic/x2apic entries in MADT in correct order Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> - 2015-09-09 17:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] acpi: Added acpi_subtable_proc to ACPI table parsers Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2015-09-09 12:50 +0200
[PATCH v4 0/2] Fix how CPUs are enumerated when there's more than 255 CPUs Lukasz Anaczkowski <lukasz.anaczkowski@intel.com> - 2015-09-09 15:50 +0200
[PATCH v4 1/2] acpi: Added acpi_subtable_proc to ACPI table parsers Lukasz Anaczkowski <lukasz.anaczkowski@intel.com> - 2015-09-09 15:50 +0200
[PATCH v4 2/2] x86, acpi: Handle apic/x2apic entries in MADT in correct order Lukasz Anaczkowski <lukasz.anaczkowski@intel.com> - 2015-09-09 15:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] Fix how CPUs are enumerated when there's more than 255 CPUs "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2015-09-09 22:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] Fix how CPUs are enumerated when there's more than 255 CPUs "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2015-09-19 00:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] acpi: Added acpi_subtable_proc to ACPI table parsers Lukasz Anaczkowski <lukasz.anaczkowski@intel.com> - 2015-09-09 15:50 +0200
[PATCH 0/2] Fix how CPUs are enumerated when there's more than 255 CPUs Lukasz Anaczkowski <lukasz.anaczkowski@intel.com> - 2015-09-09 11:40 +0200
csiph-web