Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1221279
| From | "Anaczkowski, Lukasz" <lukasz.anaczkowski@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | RE: [PATCH 0/4] Fix how CPUs are enumerated when there's more than 255 CPUs |
| Date | 2015-09-09 09:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <q6HG2-4db-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <q21P3-v3-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <q6oWK-2qG-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <q6oWK-2qG-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <q6tWq-16N-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
From: Marc Zyngier [mailto:marc.zyngier@arm.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2015 6:28 PM > In my view, this makes the change a lot more palatable, and it can fit in exactly two patches: > > 1) add the acpi_subtable_proc stuff with the compatibility helpers > 2) change arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c to do whatever you want it > to do > It will be a lot easier to review and to verify. Thanks, Marc. Sounds you're right, I'll try to follow KISS rule better next time. Will send updated patches. Cheers, Lukasz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH] x86, arm64, acpi: Handle lapic/x2apic entries in MADT Lukasz Anaczkowski <lukasz.anaczkowski@intel.com> - 2015-09-08 13:10 +0200
[PATCH 1/4] acpi: rename acpi_table_parse_entries Lukasz Anaczkowski <lukasz.anaczkowski@intel.com> - 2015-09-08 13:10 +0200
[PATCH 0/4] Fix how CPUs are enumerated when there's more than 255 CPUs Lukasz Anaczkowski <lukasz.anaczkowski@intel.com> - 2015-09-08 13:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/4] Fix how CPUs are enumerated when there's more than 255 CPUs Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2015-09-08 18:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/4] Fix how CPUs are enumerated when there's more than 255 CPUs Al Stone <ahs3@redhat.com> - 2015-09-09 00:50 +0200
RE: [PATCH 0/4] Fix how CPUs are enumerated when there's more than 255 CPUs "Anaczkowski, Lukasz" <lukasz.anaczkowski@intel.com> - 2015-09-09 09:10 +0200
[PATCH 1/2] acpi: Added acpi_subtable_proc to ACPI table parsers Lukasz Anaczkowski <lukasz.anaczkowski@intel.com> - 2015-09-09 11:40 +0200
[PATCH 2/2] x86, acpi: Handle apic/x2apic entries in MADT in correct order Lukasz Anaczkowski <lukasz.anaczkowski@intel.com> - 2015-09-09 11:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86, acpi: Handle apic/x2apic entries in MADT in correct order Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> - 2015-09-09 16:00 +0200
RE: [PATCH 2/2] x86, acpi: Handle apic/x2apic entries in MADT in correct order "Anaczkowski, Lukasz" <lukasz.anaczkowski@intel.com> - 2015-09-09 16:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86, acpi: Handle apic/x2apic entries in MADT in correct order Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> - 2015-09-09 17:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] acpi: Added acpi_subtable_proc to ACPI table parsers Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2015-09-09 12:50 +0200
[PATCH v4 0/2] Fix how CPUs are enumerated when there's more than 255 CPUs Lukasz Anaczkowski <lukasz.anaczkowski@intel.com> - 2015-09-09 15:50 +0200
[PATCH v4 1/2] acpi: Added acpi_subtable_proc to ACPI table parsers Lukasz Anaczkowski <lukasz.anaczkowski@intel.com> - 2015-09-09 15:50 +0200
[PATCH v4 2/2] x86, acpi: Handle apic/x2apic entries in MADT in correct order Lukasz Anaczkowski <lukasz.anaczkowski@intel.com> - 2015-09-09 15:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] Fix how CPUs are enumerated when there's more than 255 CPUs "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2015-09-09 22:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] Fix how CPUs are enumerated when there's more than 255 CPUs "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2015-09-19 00:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] acpi: Added acpi_subtable_proc to ACPI table parsers Lukasz Anaczkowski <lukasz.anaczkowski@intel.com> - 2015-09-09 15:50 +0200
[PATCH 0/2] Fix how CPUs are enumerated when there's more than 255 CPUs Lukasz Anaczkowski <lukasz.anaczkowski@intel.com> - 2015-09-09 11:40 +0200
csiph-web