Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1328600
| From | Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: N900 sleep mode (in 4.5-rc0, if that matters) |
| Date | 2016-02-07 22:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qZFdM-3BZ-27@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <qWM26-1Zb-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qXreW-6Nz-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <qXu38-mK-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <qXuZc-112-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <qYkO5-4mH-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi!
> > > No, sorry, that was with 4.4. As you hit "PM regression with commit
> > > 5de85b9d57ab PM runtime re-init in v4.5-rc1", I thought I'd avoid
> > > v4.5-rc.
> >
> > OK
> >
> > > (I assume I have to insmod and rmmod, right? Because powersave is not
> > > entered if I simply compile-out usb).
> >
> > Depending on what the bootloader does and probably also if
> > USB was used during the booting.. So yeah you may need to modprobe
> > and then rmmod.
> >
> > > Would you have commit ids for those rmmod fixes? It might be good to
> > > push them into stable, and I should try again with them applied...
> >
> > 055555fc459 ("usb: musb: core: Fix handling of the phy notifications")
> > 03e43528ab68 ("usb: musb: Fix unbalanced pm_runtime_enable")
>
> Oh and looks like these two phy-twl4030-phy fixes never got
> merged from thread "[PATCH 0/2] Two phy-twl4030-usb fixes for
> unloading the module":
>
> phy: twl4030-usb: Relase usb phy on unload
> phy: twl4030-usb: Fix unbalanced pm_runtime_enable on module reload
>
> I'll resend those. But without those again deeper idle states
> are blocked.. And it could be that n900 needs similar additional
> patches for it's USB PHY as I've tested things so far only with
> phy-twl4030-usb PHY based systems.
I don't get it. I was using
+CONFIG_USB_MUSB_OMAP2PLUS=m
+CONFIG_TWL4030_USB=m
on the n900. Are you suggesting I should be using something else on
the N900? If so, what?
Pali, do you have deeper sleep states working on 4.4 kernel? (Or
anything 4.X?)
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: N900 sleep mode (in 4.5-rc0, if that matters) Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> - 2016-01-30 21:10 +0100
Re: N900 sleep mode (in 4.5-rc0, if that matters) Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> - 2016-01-30 21:20 +0100
Re: N900 sleep mode (in 4.5-rc0, if that matters) Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> - 2016-01-30 23:20 +0100
Re: N900 sleep mode (in 4.5-rc0, if that matters) Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> - 2016-02-01 19:20 +0100
Re: N900 sleep mode (in 4.5-rc0, if that matters) Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> - 2016-02-01 22:20 +0100
Re: N900 sleep mode (in 4.5-rc0, if that matters) Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> - 2016-02-01 23:20 +0100
Re: N900 sleep mode (in 4.5-rc0, if that matters) Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> - 2016-02-04 06:40 +0100
Re: N900 sleep mode (in 4.5-rc0, if that matters) Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> - 2016-02-07 22:40 +0100
Re: N900 sleep mode (in 4.5-rc0, if that matters) Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 10:00 +0100
Re: N900 sleep mode (in 4.5-rc0, if that matters) Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> - 2016-02-07 22:30 +0100
csiph-web