Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1325945
| From | Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v3] net:Add sysctl_max_skb_frags |
| Date | 2016-02-03 22:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qYcQy-7bF-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <qY8ae-4bZ-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <qY9J1-54N-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qY9SG-58b-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <qYalI-5xv-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <qYbhM-67g-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, 2016-02-03 at 10:24 -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote: > >> If this is only meant to be a performance modification and is only >> really targeted at TCP TSO/GRO then all I ask is that we use a name >> like tcp_max_gso_frags and relocate the sysctl to the TCP section. >> Otherwise if we are actually going to try to scope this out on a wider >> level and limit all frags which is what the name implies then the >> patch set needs to make a better attempt at covering all cases where >> it may apply. > > > This is the goal. > > Other skb providers (like tun and af_packet) will also use this optional > limit. > > I fail to see why Hans should send a complete patch series. You realize that conflicts with what anybody else would be told. What was provided in this patch is a half solution, and it may cause bigger messes since it is unclear exactly how this sysctl is meant to be used. > We will send followup patches, as we always did. > > I will send the GRO change for example. > > So please keep a sysctl name _without_ TCP in it, it really has nothing > to do with TCP. In the end I am not the one you have to convince. I have simply stated my opinion, and I guess we will have to agree to disagree. It is entirely up to Dave if he wants to apply it or not. I have slides I need to work on for next week.. :-) - Alex
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v3] net:Add sysctl_max_skb_frags Hans Westgaard Ry <hans.westgaard.ry@oracle.com> - 2016-02-03 09:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3] net:Add sysctl_max_skb_frags Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> - 2016-02-03 12:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3] net:Add sysctl_max_skb_frags Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> - 2016-02-03 12:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3] net:Add sysctl_max_skb_frags Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> - 2016-02-03 13:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3] net:Add sysctl_max_skb_frags Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> - 2016-02-03 15:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3] net:Add sysctl_max_skb_frags Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 15:40 +0100
RE: [PATCH v3] net:Add sysctl_max_skb_frags David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM> - 2016-02-03 18:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3] net:Add sysctl_max_skb_frags Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 17:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3] net:Add sysctl_max_skb_frags Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 17:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3] net:Add sysctl_max_skb_frags Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 18:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3] net:Add sysctl_max_skb_frags Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 19:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3] net:Add sysctl_max_skb_frags Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 19:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3] net:Add sysctl_max_skb_frags Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 20:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3] net:Add sysctl_max_skb_frags Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 22:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3] net:Add sysctl_max_skb_frags David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> - 2016-02-09 10:40 +0100
csiph-web