Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1325945

Re: [PATCH v3] net:Add sysctl_max_skb_frags

From Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v3] net:Add sysctl_max_skb_frags
Date 2016-02-03 22:10 +0100
Message-ID <qYcQy-7bF-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (3 earlier) <qY8ae-4bZ-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <qY9J1-54N-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qY9SG-58b-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <qYalI-5xv-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <qYbhM-67g-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-02-03 at 10:24 -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>
>> If this is only meant to be a performance modification and is only
>> really targeted at TCP TSO/GRO then all I ask is that we use a name
>> like tcp_max_gso_frags and relocate the sysctl to the TCP section.
>> Otherwise if we are actually going to try to scope this out on a wider
>> level and limit all frags which is what the name implies then the
>> patch set needs to make a better attempt at covering all cases where
>> it may apply.
>
>
> This is the goal.
>
> Other skb providers (like tun and af_packet) will also use this optional
> limit.
>
> I fail to see why Hans should send a complete patch series.

You realize that conflicts with what anybody else would be told.  What
was provided in this patch is a half solution, and it may cause bigger
messes since it is unclear exactly how this sysctl is meant to be
used.

> We will send followup patches, as we always did.
>
> I will send the GRO change for example.
>
> So please keep a sysctl name _without_ TCP in it, it really has nothing
> to do with TCP.

In the end I am not the one you have to convince.  I have simply
stated my opinion, and I guess we will have to agree to disagree.  It
is entirely up to Dave if he wants to apply it or not.  I have slides
I need to work on for next week.. :-)

- Alex

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH v3] net:Add sysctl_max_skb_frags Hans Westgaard Ry <hans.westgaard.ry@oracle.com> - 2016-02-03 09:30 +0100
  Re: [PATCH v3] net:Add sysctl_max_skb_frags Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> - 2016-02-03 12:30 +0100
    Re: [PATCH v3] net:Add sysctl_max_skb_frags Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> - 2016-02-03 12:40 +0100
      Re: [PATCH v3] net:Add sysctl_max_skb_frags Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> - 2016-02-03 13:30 +0100
        Re: [PATCH v3] net:Add sysctl_max_skb_frags Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> - 2016-02-03 15:10 +0100
        Re: [PATCH v3] net:Add sysctl_max_skb_frags Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 15:40 +0100
        RE: [PATCH v3] net:Add sysctl_max_skb_frags David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM> - 2016-02-03 18:40 +0100
  Re: [PATCH v3] net:Add sysctl_max_skb_frags Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 17:00 +0100
    Re: [PATCH v3] net:Add sysctl_max_skb_frags Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 17:10 +0100
      Re: [PATCH v3] net:Add sysctl_max_skb_frags Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 18:50 +0100
        Re: [PATCH v3] net:Add sysctl_max_skb_frags Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 19:00 +0100
          Re: [PATCH v3] net:Add sysctl_max_skb_frags Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 19:30 +0100
            Re: [PATCH v3] net:Add sysctl_max_skb_frags Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 20:30 +0100
              Re: [PATCH v3] net:Add sysctl_max_skb_frags Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 22:10 +0100
  Re: [PATCH v3] net:Add sysctl_max_skb_frags David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> - 2016-02-09 10:40 +0100

csiph-web