Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1320212
| From | Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v3] watchdog: Add watchdog timer support for the WinSystems EBC-C384 |
| Date | 2016-01-28 03:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qVK2l-4kg-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <qUYTM-2XX-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <qV0Ce-4ad-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qVlnl-385-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <qVqwF-6UH-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qVItz-3lw-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 01/27/2016 04:18 PM, William Breathitt Gray wrote: > On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 09:02:45PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: >>> Unfortunately, the sensors-detect only reported "No" for each Super I/O >>> chip test, while the superiotool gave an unhelpful "No Super I/O chip >>> detected" message. >>> >> >> Too bad. That suggests that the watchdog may in fact be implemented in the fpga. > > I received a response from WinSystems: the watchdog timer is implemented > in the Lattice FPGA (base address 0x298), along with other WinSystems > firmware. I was offered two methods of identifying the chip. > > The first method is to use a 16-bit read of the register at port address > 0x29E to get the version number of the watchdog timer; my machine > reported a value of 0x0009. Unfortunately, I don't believe this method > is very reliable since the version number may not be consistent across > these motherboards, and the same value could easily happen to be > returned by an unknown hardware. > > The second method is slightly more involved so I'll quote WinSystems: > >> 8-bit read of 299h – save this value >> 8-bit write of 60h to 299h >> 16-bit read of 29ah should return the base address of the WDT which is 564h >> 8-bit write of saved value to 299h - don’t want t accidentally change the WDT base address > > If the system does return a value of 0x564, then it's pretty safe to say > that the watchdog timer is implemented on the chip. However, I'm not > sure it would be safe to send write commands to a port address until the > hardware has been identified; this second method may not be the best > route either. > > What do you think? > Let's stick with DMI. Thanks, Guenter
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v3] watchdog: Add watchdog timer support for the WinSystems EBC-C384 William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 20:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3] watchdog: Add watchdog timer support for the WinSystems EBC-C384 One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> - 2016-01-25 20:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3] watchdog: Add watchdog timer support for the WinSystems EBC-C384 Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2016-01-25 21:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3] watchdog: Add watchdog timer support for the WinSystems EBC-C384 William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 00:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3] watchdog: Add watchdog timer support for the WinSystems EBC-C384 Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2016-01-26 02:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3] watchdog: Add watchdog timer support for the WinSystems EBC-C384 William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@gmail.com> - 2016-01-27 00:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3] watchdog: Add watchdog timer support for the WinSystems EBC-C384 Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2016-01-27 06:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3] watchdog: Add watchdog timer support for the WinSystems EBC-C384 William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@gmail.com> - 2016-01-28 01:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3] watchdog: Add watchdog timer support for the WinSystems EBC-C384 Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2016-01-28 03:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3] watchdog: Add watchdog timer support for the WinSystems EBC-C384 One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> - 2016-01-28 12:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3] watchdog: Add watchdog timer support for the WinSystems EBC-C384 Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2016-01-26 03:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3] watchdog: Add watchdog timer support for the WinSystems EBC-C384 Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2016-01-26 02:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3] watchdog: Add watchdog timer support for the WinSystems EBC-C384 Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl> - 2016-01-26 10:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3] watchdog: Add watchdog timer support for the WinSystems EBC-C384 William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 13:40 +0100
csiph-web