Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1315304
| From | Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: core: Use a bitfield for continuous_voltage_range |
| Date | 2016-01-22 22:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qTRKG-1ss-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qTu1H-1V0-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <qTPpw-8pj-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qTRB1-1oj-33@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Fri, 2016-01-22 at 21:31 +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 11:15:28AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > > On Thu, 2016-01-21 at 20:24 +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > - bool continuous_voltage_range; > > > + unsigned int continuous_voltage_range:1; > > > Is this really valuable? > > > There are already padding bytes that are unused > > and adding a couple more bools would be space > > cost-free and more readable. > > > I believe that read/write of bytes is also more > > efficient on some architectures than bit field > > read/modify/write uses. > > It adds up when you get more flags and these are not in the least bit > performance sensitive. Sure, but intelligibility is useful too. Do you expect to have more than 4 of these flags?
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 1/2] regulator: core: Use a bitfield for continuous_voltage_range Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-01-21 21:30 +0100
[PATCH 2/2] regulator: core: Provide per-regulator runtime PM support Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-01-21 21:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/2] regulator: core: Provide per-regulator runtime PM support kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> - 2016-01-21 23:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: core: Use a bitfield for continuous_voltage_range Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2016-01-22 20:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: core: Use a bitfield for continuous_voltage_range Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-01-22 22:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: core: Use a bitfield for continuous_voltage_range Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2016-01-22 22:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: core: Use a bitfield for continuous_voltage_range Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-01-23 16:20 +0100
csiph-web