Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1309214
| From | Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] PCI support added to ARC |
| Date | 2016-01-14 13:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qQOT0-6Lb-31@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qQ9mO-2VW-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qQNDA-5Lf-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <qQNNf-5OE-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thursday 14 January 2016 10:51:32 Vineet Gupta wrote: > >> > >> A somewhat nicer method would be to have callback pointers in struct > >> pci_host_bridge, and call those when they are non-NULL so we can > >> remove the global pcibios_* functions from the API. That would also > >> bring us a big step closer to having PCI support itself as a loadable > >> module, and it would better reflect that those functions are really > >> host bridge specific rather than architecture specific. When you use > >> the same host bridge on multiple architectures, you typically have > >> the same requirements for hacks in there, but each architectures may > >> need to support multiple host bridges with different requirements. > > Since we will be constantly improving the driver and the core itself, I suggest > > that this functions be made __weak and in an update we can turn it struct > > pointers just like Arnd suggested. Is this good for you? > > There is no point in making it weak, w/o a fallback version in generic code. For > this series, I suggest you just remove the straggler EXPORT_SYMBOL and respin. > To clarify: I don't particularly like __weak functions anywhere, but they are already common in drivers/pci, so we can add a couple more to reach the goal of removing all architecture specific code. However, there should never be a reason to add a __weak function in arch code that gets overridden by common code, that would be very confusing and not helpful. Arnd
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v5 0/2] adding PCI support to AXS10x Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@synopsys.com> - 2016-01-12 16:50 +0100
[PATCH v5 1/2] PCI support added to ARC Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@synopsys.com> - 2016-01-12 16:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] PCI support added to ARC Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com> - 2016-01-14 06:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] PCI support added to ARC Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-01-14 11:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] PCI support added to ARC Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@synopsys.com> - 2016-01-14 11:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] PCI support added to ARC Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@synopsys.com> - 2016-01-14 12:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] PCI support added to ARC Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com> - 2016-01-14 12:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] PCI support added to ARC Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-01-14 13:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] PCI support added to ARC Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com> - 2016-01-14 13:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] PCI support added to ARC Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com> - 2016-01-14 12:20 +0100
csiph-web