Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1303885
| From | Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: net-thunder: One check less in nicvf_register_interrupts() after error detection |
| Date | 2016-01-07 21:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qOpFp-4Sh-21@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <qOoT0-4ij-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <qOp2F-4BD-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <qOp2F-4BD-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <qOpm3-4Jn-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <qOpvH-4NZ-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu, 2016-01-07 at 21:38 +0100, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > > Some prefer that source code be "templatized" regardless > > of the number of exit points that any particular use of a > > specific function type. [] > > Some of your patches are converting these templatized > > functions to a different form for no added value. > > Would you like to distinguish a bit more between my evolving > collection of update suggestions and the concrete proposal > for the function "nicvf_register_interrupts"? No. > > These patches make the local source code inconsistent > > and generally goes against the authors preferred style. > > Which programming approach will be the leading one here finally? Whatever the developer wants. There is no _best_ or _only_ style for this.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH] net-thunder: One check less in nicvf_register_interrupts() after error detection Robert Richter <rric@kernel.org> - 2016-01-07 12:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH] net-thunder: One check less in nicvf_register_interrupts() after error detection SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-01-07 20:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH] net-thunder: One check less in nicvf_register_interrupts() after error detection Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2016-01-07 20:50 +0100
Re: net-thunder: One check less in nicvf_register_interrupts() after error detection SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-01-07 21:00 +0100
Re: net-thunder: One check less in nicvf_register_interrupts() after error detection SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-01-07 21:10 +0100
Re: net-thunder: One check less in nicvf_register_interrupts() after error detection Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2016-01-07 21:30 +0100
Re: net-thunder: One check less in nicvf_register_interrupts() after error detection SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-01-07 21:40 +0100
Re: net-thunder: One check less in nicvf_register_interrupts() after error detection Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2016-01-07 21:50 +0100
Re: net-thunder: One check less in nicvf_register_interrupts() after error detection Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2016-01-07 21:10 +0100
csiph-web