Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1304899
| From | David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | [RFC PATCH 01/15] X.509: Partially revert patch to add validation against IMA MOK keyring |
| Date | 2016-01-08 19:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qOK7b-2eA-91@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qOK78-2eA-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 |
Partially revert commit 41c89b64d7184a780f12f2cccdabe65cb2408893:
Author: Petko Manolov <petkan@mip-labs.com>
Date: Wed Dec 2 17:47:55 2015 +0200
IMA: create machine owner and blacklist keyrings
The problem is that prep->trusted is a simple boolean and the additional
x509_validate_trust() call doesn't therefore distinguish levels of
trustedness, but is just OR'd with the result of validation against the
system trusted keyring.
However, setting the trusted flag means that this key may be added to *any*
trusted-only keyring - including the system trusted keyring.
Whilst I appreciate what the patch is trying to do, I don't think this is
quite the right solution.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Petko Manolov <petkan@mip-labs.com>
cc: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
cc: keyrings@vger.kernel.org
---
crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_public_key.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_public_key.c b/crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_public_key.c
index 9e9e5a6a9ed6..2a44b3752471 100644
--- a/crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_public_key.c
+++ b/crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_public_key.c
@@ -321,8 +321,6 @@ static int x509_key_preparse(struct key_preparsed_payload *prep)
goto error_free_cert;
} else if (!prep->trusted) {
ret = x509_validate_trust(cert, get_system_trusted_keyring());
- if (ret)
- ret = x509_validate_trust(cert, get_ima_mok_keyring());
if (!ret)
prep->trusted = 1;
}
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC PATCH 00/15] KEYS: Restrict additions to 'trusted' keyrings David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-01-08 19:40 +0100
[RFC PATCH 10/15] X.509: Extract signature digest and make self-signed cert checks earlier David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-01-08 19:40 +0100
[RFC PATCH 03/15] KEYS: Generalise system_verify_data() to provide access to internal content David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-01-08 19:40 +0100
[RFC PATCH 05/15] KEYS: Add an alloc flag to convey the builtinness of a key David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-01-08 19:40 +0100
[RFC PATCH 12/15] X.509: Move the trust validation code out to its own file David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-01-08 19:40 +0100
[RFC PATCH 11/15] PKCS#7: Make the signature a pointer rather than embedding it David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-01-08 19:40 +0100
[RFC PATCH 01/15] X.509: Partially revert patch to add validation against IMA MOK keyring David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-01-08 19:40 +0100
[RFC PATCH 06/15] KEYS: Add a facility to restrict new links into a keyring David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-01-08 19:40 +0100
[RFC PATCH 02/15] X.509: Don't treat self-signed keys specially David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-01-08 19:40 +0100
[RFC PATCH 07/15] KEYS: Allow authentication data to be stored in an asymmetric key David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-01-08 19:40 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 00/15] KEYS: Restrict additions to 'trusted' keyrings Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-01-08 20:00 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 00/15] KEYS: Restrict additions to 'trusted' keyrings Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-01-08 20:30 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 00/15] KEYS: Restrict additions to 'trusted' keyrings David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-01-12 01:40 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 00/15] KEYS: Restrict additions to 'trusted' keyrings Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-01-12 03:50 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 00/15] KEYS: Restrict additions to 'trusted' keyrings David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-01-12 01:40 +0100
csiph-web