Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1304902
| From | David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | [RFC PATCH 02/15] X.509: Don't treat self-signed keys specially |
| Date | 2016-01-08 19:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qOK7b-2eA-85@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qOK78-2eA-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 |
Trust for a self-signed certificate can normally only be determined by
whether we obtained it from a trusted location (ie. it was built into the
kernel at compile time), so there's not really any point in checking it -
we could verify that the signature is valid, but it doesn't really tell us
anything if the signature checks out.
However, there's a bug in the code determining whether a certificate is
self-signed or not - if they have neither AKID nor SKID then we just assume
that the cert is self-signed, which may not be true.
Given this, remove the code that treats self-signed certs specially when it
comes to evaluating trustability and attempt to evaluate them as ordinary
signed certificates. We then expect self-signed certificates to fail the
trustability check and be marked as untrustworthy in x509_key_preparse().
Note that there is the possibility of the trustability check on a
self-signed cert then succeeding. This is most likely to happen when a
duplicate of the certificate is already on the trust keyring - in which
case it shouldn't be a problem.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
cc: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_public_key.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_public_key.c b/crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_public_key.c
index 2a44b3752471..25455567ac06 100644
--- a/crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_public_key.c
+++ b/crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_public_key.c
@@ -255,6 +255,9 @@ static int x509_validate_trust(struct x509_certificate *cert,
struct key *key;
int ret = 1;
+ if (!cert->akid_id && !cert->akid_skid)
+ return 1;
+
if (!trust_keyring)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
@@ -312,17 +315,21 @@ static int x509_key_preparse(struct key_preparsed_payload *prep)
cert->pub->algo = pkey_algo[cert->pub->pkey_algo];
cert->pub->id_type = PKEY_ID_X509;
- /* Check the signature on the key if it appears to be self-signed */
- if ((!cert->akid_skid && !cert->akid_id) ||
- asymmetric_key_id_same(cert->skid, cert->akid_skid) ||
- asymmetric_key_id_same(cert->id, cert->akid_id)) {
- ret = x509_check_signature(cert->pub, cert); /* self-signed */
- if (ret < 0)
- goto error_free_cert;
- } else if (!prep->trusted) {
+ /* See if we can derive the trustability of this certificate.
+ *
+ * When it comes to self-signed certificates, we cannot evaluate
+ * trustedness except by the fact that we obtained it from a trusted
+ * location. So we just rely on x509_validate_trust() failing in this
+ * case.
+ *
+ * Note that there's a possibility of a self-signed cert matching a
+ * cert that we have (most likely a duplicate that we already trust) -
+ * in which case it will be marked trusted.
+ */
+ if (!prep->trusted) {
ret = x509_validate_trust(cert, get_system_trusted_keyring());
if (!ret)
- prep->trusted = 1;
+ prep->trusted = true;
}
/* Propose a description */
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC PATCH 00/15] KEYS: Restrict additions to 'trusted' keyrings David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-01-08 19:40 +0100
[RFC PATCH 10/15] X.509: Extract signature digest and make self-signed cert checks earlier David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-01-08 19:40 +0100
[RFC PATCH 03/15] KEYS: Generalise system_verify_data() to provide access to internal content David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-01-08 19:40 +0100
[RFC PATCH 05/15] KEYS: Add an alloc flag to convey the builtinness of a key David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-01-08 19:40 +0100
[RFC PATCH 12/15] X.509: Move the trust validation code out to its own file David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-01-08 19:40 +0100
[RFC PATCH 11/15] PKCS#7: Make the signature a pointer rather than embedding it David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-01-08 19:40 +0100
[RFC PATCH 01/15] X.509: Partially revert patch to add validation against IMA MOK keyring David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-01-08 19:40 +0100
[RFC PATCH 06/15] KEYS: Add a facility to restrict new links into a keyring David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-01-08 19:40 +0100
[RFC PATCH 02/15] X.509: Don't treat self-signed keys specially David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-01-08 19:40 +0100
[RFC PATCH 07/15] KEYS: Allow authentication data to be stored in an asymmetric key David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-01-08 19:40 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 00/15] KEYS: Restrict additions to 'trusted' keyrings Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-01-08 20:00 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 00/15] KEYS: Restrict additions to 'trusted' keyrings Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-01-08 20:30 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 00/15] KEYS: Restrict additions to 'trusted' keyrings David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-01-12 01:40 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 00/15] KEYS: Restrict additions to 'trusted' keyrings Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-01-12 03:50 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 00/15] KEYS: Restrict additions to 'trusted' keyrings David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-01-12 01:40 +0100
csiph-web