Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1304257
| From | Ursula Braun <ubraun@linux.vnet.ibm.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: 390/qeth: Delete an unnecessary variable initialisation in qeth_core_set_online() |
| Date | 2016-01-08 09:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qOAAN-45F-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qEuGl-43C-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <qMNLQ-40q-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qMNLQ-40q-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <qOjTk-SP-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <qOzv3-3m3-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Fri, 2016-01-08 at 08:18 +0100, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > > As Heiko already answered, you could propose a lot of this kind of changes > > with just minor benefit. I do not want to push them in single patches. > > Thanks for your clarification. > > > > Either there is a cleanup patch for explicit initialisation of > > local variables in the whole qeth driver, > > Is there any more fine-tuning cooking in the background? Not yet; qeth is an important driver for Linux on System z; there are lots of investigation ideas for improvements, which we will take care about according to their priorities. I regard your proposed fine-tuning code change as valid, but prioritize it as one with lowest benefit, since it does not really make a difference once compiled. > > > > or we take care about such minor changes, once we touch the code anyway > > How often will this really happen? There is no general rule. Check our git history to answer this question. > > > > due to other reasons. > > I am curious which ones will trigger further related software improvements. > > Regards, > Markus >
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 0/2] 390/qeth: Fine-tuning for qeth_core_set_online() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-01-03 11:10 +0100
[PATCH 1/2] 390/qeth: Delete an unnecessary variable initialisation in qeth_core_set_online() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-01-03 11:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/2] 390/qeth: Delete an unnecessary variable initialisation in qeth_core_set_online() Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> - 2016-01-04 12:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/2] 390/qeth: Delete an unnecessary variable initialisation in qeth_core_set_online() Ursula Braun <ubraun@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-01-07 15:40 +0100
Re: 390/qeth: Delete an unnecessary variable initialisation in qeth_core_set_online() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-01-08 08:20 +0100
Re: 390/qeth: Delete an unnecessary variable initialisation in qeth_core_set_online() Ursula Braun <ubraun@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-01-08 09:30 +0100
Re: 390/qeth: Delete an unnecessary variable initialisation in qeth_core_set_online() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-01-08 13:10 +0100
[PATCH 2/2] 390/qeth: Refactoring for qeth_core_set_online() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-01-03 11:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/2] 390/qeth: Refactoring for qeth_core_set_online() Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> - 2016-01-04 12:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/2] 390/qeth: Refactoring for qeth_core_set_online() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-01-04 14:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/2] 390/qeth: Refactoring for qeth_core_set_online() Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> - 2016-01-04 15:10 +0100
Re: 390/qeth: Refactoring for qeth_core_set_online() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-01-04 15:20 +0100
Re: 390/qeth: Refactoring for qeth_core_set_online() Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> - 2016-01-05 09:00 +0100
csiph-web