Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1300388

Re: [RFC] ->get_link(), ->put_link() and cookies

From Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [RFC] ->get_link(), ->put_link() and cookies
Date 2016-01-03 21:50 +0100
Message-ID <qMXLc-1Rv-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qM1xv-6DT-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <qMWYP-1kX-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <qMXrQ-1KX-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 12:21 PM, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> Just to make sure - that does include 13/13, presumably?

Ugh, no, I had set that aside and then forgot all about it.

I'm not sure about 13/13.  I'm ok with it, but I'm not sure it's any
less confusing than the cookie was.

I like how it removes "put_link()" as a callback, but at the same time
I think it's even more abstract than the cookie was.

The main worry I have is that the naming is generic, but there's only
a single very specialized use for it. Do we expect other uses?

Because if not, I think it would be clearer if it was named to be more
concretely about putlink, and avoid the fact that it feels very
abstract.

Don't get me wrong - abstract generalized helper functions are cool.
But people aren't very abstract, and it tends to make for confusing
code when you aren't intimately familiar with the rules.

                 Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[RFC] ->get_link(), ->put_link() and cookies Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> - 2016-01-01 07:40 +0100
  [PATCH 02/13] logfs: don't duplicate page_symlink_inode_operations Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> - 2016-01-01 07:40 +0100
  [PATCH 11/13] teach nfs_get_link() to work in RCU mode Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> - 2016-01-01 07:40 +0100
  [PATCH 03/13] udf: don't duplicate page_symlink_inode_operations Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> - 2016-01-01 07:40 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 03/13] udf: don't duplicate page_symlink_inode_operations Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> - 2016-01-05 17:30 +0100
  [PATCH 01/13] switch befs long symlinks to page_symlink_operations Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> - 2016-01-01 07:40 +0100
  [PATCH 09/13] teach shmem_get_link() to work in RCU mode Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> - 2016-01-01 07:40 +0100
  [PATCH 06/13] don't put symlink bodies in pagecache into highmem Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> - 2016-01-01 07:40 +0100
  [PATCH 12/13] kill free_page_put_link() Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> - 2016-01-01 07:50 +0100
  [PATCH 05/13] namei: page_getlink() and page_follow_link_light() are the same thing Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> - 2016-01-01 07:50 +0100
  [PATCH 10/13] teach proc_self_get_link()/proc_thread_self_get_link() to work in RCU mode Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> - 2016-01-01 07:50 +0100
  [PATCH 08/13] teach page_get_link() to work in RCU mode Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> - 2016-01-01 07:50 +0100
  [PATCH 04/13] ufs: get rid of ->setattr() for symlinks Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> - 2016-01-01 07:50 +0100
  Re: [RFC] ->get_link(), ->put_link() and cookies Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-01-03 21:00 +0100
    Re: [RFC] ->get_link(), ->put_link() and cookies Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> - 2016-01-03 21:30 +0100
      Re: [RFC] ->get_link(), ->put_link() and cookies Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-01-03 21:50 +0100
        Re: [RFC] ->get_link(), ->put_link() and cookies Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> - 2016-01-03 22:50 +0100

csiph-web