Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1299346
| From | Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH V9 1/2] ACPI, PCI, irq: remove interrupt count restriction |
| Date | 2015-12-30 14:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qLoZb-79S-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <qDPDc-2e2-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <qDQfX-2uA-81@gated-at.bofh.it> <qDQpz-2N1-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <qDQzf-2Qo-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qLoZb-79S-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> wrote: > On 12/9/2015 12:14 PM, Christopher Covington wrote: >>> On 12/9/2015 11:59 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >>>>> + if (trigger != ACPI_MADT_TRIGGER_LEVEL || >>>>>> + polarity != ACPI_MADT_POLARITY_ACTIVE_LOW) >>>>>> + penalty = PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS; >>>>>> + else >>>>>> + penalty = PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING; >>>>>> + >>>>>> + acpi_irq_add_penalty(irq, penalty); >>>> Why not to change in place? I think a common sense rule is not to >>>> change something existing if it doesn't add any significant value. >>>> - acpi_irq_penalty[irq] += PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING; >>>> + acpi_irq_add_penalty(irq, PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING); >> >> I think Andy was suggesting that you make the change without introducing >> the penalty variable. > Is Chris' interpretation correct? Yep, I meant not to use an additional variable. > BTW, I suggest you spend some time around checkpatch for contributions. I could > have caught most of the issues you are generally concerned before submitting a patch. Is it a question? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH V9 1/2] ACPI, PCI, irq: remove interrupt count restriction Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> - 2015-12-30 14:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH V9 1/2] ACPI, PCI, irq: remove interrupt count restriction Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> - 2015-12-30 20:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH V9 1/2] ACPI, PCI, irq: remove interrupt count restriction Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> - 2015-12-30 21:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH V9 1/2] ACPI, PCI, irq: remove interrupt count restriction "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-01-01 01:20 +0100
csiph-web