Re: [PATCH v2] i2c: designware: Do not require clock when SSCN and FFCN are provided

From	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH v2] i2c: designware: Do not require clock when SSCN and FFCN are provided
Date	2015-12-23 09:50 +0100
Message-ID	<qINho-7kO-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<qGwum-1Cf-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <qH0iK-4hR-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <qICch-kW-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo

Show all headers | View raw

On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 02:51:13PM -0600, Suravee Suthikulanit wrote:
> So, at this point, I can re-submit the V3 and combine these changes, and we
> both can sign-off. How does that sound?

Sounds good to me :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[PATCH v2] i2c: designware: Do not require clock when SSCN and FFCN are provided Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> - 2015-12-17 03:30 +0100
  Re: [PATCH v2] i2c: designware: Do not require clock when SSCN and  FFCN are provided Loc Ho <lho@apm.com> - 2015-12-17 04:00 +0100
  Re: [PATCH v2] i2c: designware: Do not require clock when SSCN and  FFCN are provided Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> - 2015-12-18 11:20 +0100
    Re: [PATCH v2] i2c: designware: Do not require clock when SSCN and  FFCN are provided Suravee Suthikulanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com> - 2015-12-22 22:00 +0100
      Re: [PATCH v2] i2c: designware: Do not require clock when SSCN and  FFCN are provided Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> - 2015-12-23 09:50 +0100

csiph-web