Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1297062

Re: [PATCH v2] i2c: designware: Do not require clock when SSCN and FFCN are provided

From Suravee Suthikulanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v2] i2c: designware: Do not require clock when SSCN and FFCN are provided
Date 2015-12-22 22:00 +0100
Message-ID <qICch-kW-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qGwum-1Cf-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <qH0iK-4hR-27@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Hi Mika,

On 12/18/2015 4:13 AM, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> [....]
> So instead of this, what if we do not assign dev->get_clk_rate_khz at
> all and then do something like below in the core driver?

I like the changes below since it is clear to see within the core file 
how things are handled when get_clk_rate_khz is not assigned (i.e. 
input_clock_hz = 0), and not necessary relying on the platform driver to 
return 0 in this case.

So, at this point, I can re-submit the V3 and combine these changes, and 
we both can sign-off. How does that sound?

Thanks,
Suravee

> Of course we still need the other changes you did in this patch to cope
> with the missing clock.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-core.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-core.c
> index 8c48b27ba059..25dccd8df772 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-core.c
> @@ -271,6 +271,17 @@ static void __i2c_dw_enable(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev, bool enable)
>   		 enable ? "en" : "dis");
>   }
>
> +static unsigned long i2c_dw_clk_rate(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev)
> +{
> +	/*
> +	 * Clock is not necessary if we got LCNT/HCNT values directly from
> +	 * the platform code.
> +	 */
> +	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!dev->get_clk_rate_khz))
> +		return 0;
> +	return dev->get_clk_rate_khz(dev);
> +}
> +
>   /**
>    * i2c_dw_init() - initialize the designware i2c master hardware
>    * @dev: device private data
> @@ -281,7 +292,6 @@ static void __i2c_dw_enable(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev, bool enable)
>    */
>   int i2c_dw_init(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev)
>   {
> -	u32 input_clock_khz;
>   	u32 hcnt, lcnt;
>   	u32 reg;
>   	u32 sda_falling_time, scl_falling_time;
> @@ -295,8 +305,6 @@ int i2c_dw_init(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev)
>   		}
>   	}
>
> -	input_clock_khz = dev->get_clk_rate_khz(dev);
> -
>   	reg = dw_readl(dev, DW_IC_COMP_TYPE);
>   	if (reg == ___constant_swab32(DW_IC_COMP_TYPE_VALUE)) {
>   		/* Configure register endianess access */
> @@ -325,12 +333,12 @@ int i2c_dw_init(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev)
>   		hcnt = dev->ss_hcnt;
>   		lcnt = dev->ss_lcnt;
>   	} else {
> -		hcnt = i2c_dw_scl_hcnt(input_clock_khz,
> +		hcnt = i2c_dw_scl_hcnt(i2c_dw_clk_rate(dev),
>   					4000,	/* tHD;STA = tHIGH = 4.0 us */
>   					sda_falling_time,
>   					0,	/* 0: DW default, 1: Ideal */
>   					0);	/* No offset */
> -		lcnt = i2c_dw_scl_lcnt(input_clock_khz,
> +		lcnt = i2c_dw_scl_lcnt(i2c_dw_clk_rate(dev),
>   					4700,	/* tLOW = 4.7 us */
>   					scl_falling_time,
>   					0);	/* No offset */
> @@ -344,12 +352,12 @@ int i2c_dw_init(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev)
>   		hcnt = dev->fs_hcnt;
>   		lcnt = dev->fs_lcnt;
>   	} else {
> -		hcnt = i2c_dw_scl_hcnt(input_clock_khz,
> +		hcnt = i2c_dw_scl_hcnt(i2c_dw_clk_rate(dev),
>   					600,	/* tHD;STA = tHIGH = 0.6 us */
>   					sda_falling_time,
>   					0,	/* 0: DW default, 1: Ideal */
>   					0);	/* No offset */
> -		lcnt = i2c_dw_scl_lcnt(input_clock_khz,
> +		lcnt = i2c_dw_scl_lcnt(i2c_dw_clk_rate(dev),
>   					1300,	/* tLOW = 1.3 us */
>   					scl_falling_time,
>   					0);	/* No offset */
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH v2] i2c: designware: Do not require clock when SSCN and FFCN are provided Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> - 2015-12-17 03:30 +0100
  Re: [PATCH v2] i2c: designware: Do not require clock when SSCN and  FFCN are provided Loc Ho <lho@apm.com> - 2015-12-17 04:00 +0100
  Re: [PATCH v2] i2c: designware: Do not require clock when SSCN and  FFCN are provided Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> - 2015-12-18 11:20 +0100
    Re: [PATCH v2] i2c: designware: Do not require clock when SSCN and  FFCN are provided Suravee Suthikulanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com> - 2015-12-22 22:00 +0100
      Re: [PATCH v2] i2c: designware: Do not require clock when SSCN and  FFCN are provided Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> - 2015-12-23 09:50 +0100

csiph-web