Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1292071

Re: staging: lustre: Less checks in mgc_process_recover_log() after error detection

From Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: staging: lustre: Less checks in mgc_process_recover_log() after error detection
Date 2015-12-15 12:50 +0100
Message-ID <qFWhb-3v9-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (4 earlier) <qFA6Z-5XO-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <qFAA2-69m-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qFAJH-6cU-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <qFBPt-6Uj-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <qFFq3-Q8-23@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 06:43:15PM +0100, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> Our software development dialogue seems to trigger special
> challenges between us so far.

I try very hard to review patches mechanically and not be biased so that
after a while people know if their patches will be merged or not without
waiting for feedback.

In this case, I had asked you not to send patches renaming out labels
and then the next day you sent me a string of patches renaming out
labels.  If you were a lustre dev then I would accept these renames
definitely.  But I believe that for anyone else, I would ask them what
the point of doing these renames is.  I do not think I have been unfair
to you.  There was no element of surprise.

Part of the reason we have CodingStyle is so that we can tell people
"That's not in CodingStyle, that's just your own opinion so don't redo
code just because you have a different opinion from the maintainer."

> Are you generally willing to change the exception handling for
> the memory allocations in the function "mgc_process_recover_log"
> at all?

I like the first patch in this series.  I do not like the renames.  I
don't care too much about patches 5 and 6 except that they should be
folded together and you should not move "req" and "eof" around.

Mostly I wish you would just focus on fixing bugs instead of these sorts
of patches.  It is a lot of work for me to explain how to redo patches
but it is worth it for bugfixes.

regards,
dan carpenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH 0/7] staging-Lustre: Fine-tuning for some function  implementations SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2015-12-13 14:50 +0100
  [PATCH 2/7] staging: lustre: Rename a jump label for  ptlrpc_req_finished() calls SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2015-12-13 15:00 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 2/7] staging: lustre: Rename a jump label for  ptlrpc_req_finished() calls Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> - 2015-12-14 08:00 +0100
      Re: [PATCH 2/7] staging: lustre: Rename a jump label for  ptlrpc_req_finished() calls SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2015-12-14 10:10 +0100
        Re: [PATCH 2/7] staging: lustre: Rename a jump label for  ptlrpc_req_finished() calls Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> - 2015-12-14 10:40 +0100
          Re: staging: lustre: Rename a jump label for ptlrpc_req_finished()  calls SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2015-12-14 11:10 +0100
  [PATCH 1/7] staging: lustre: Delete unnecessary goto statements in  six functions SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2015-12-13 15:00 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 1/7] staging: lustre: Delete unnecessary goto statements  in six functions Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2015-12-15 15:30 +0100
      Re: [PATCH 1/7] staging: lustre: Delete unnecessary goto statements  in six functions Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> - 2015-12-15 15:50 +0100
        Re: [PATCH 1/7] staging: lustre: Delete unnecessary goto statements  in six functions Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2015-12-15 16:10 +0100
          Re: [PATCH 1/7] staging: lustre: Delete unnecessary goto statements  in six functions Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> - 2015-12-15 18:50 +0100
            Re: [PATCH 1/7] staging: lustre: Delete unnecessary goto statements  in six functions Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2015-12-15 19:20 +0100
              Re: staging: lustre: Delete unnecessary goto statements in six  functions SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2015-12-15 19:30 +0100
                Re: staging: lustre: Delete unnecessary goto statements in six  functions Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2015-12-15 19:40 +0100
                Re: staging: lustre: Delete unnecessary goto statements in six  functions SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2015-12-15 20:00 +0100
                Re: staging: lustre: Delete unnecessary goto statements in six  functions Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2015-12-15 20:00 +0100
          Re: staging: lustre: Delete unnecessary goto statements in six  functions SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2015-12-15 19:10 +0100
            Re: staging: lustre: Delete unnecessary goto statements in six  functions Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2015-12-15 19:30 +0100
  [PATCH 3/7] staging: lustre: Rename a jump label for a kfree(key)  call SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2015-12-13 15:00 +0100
  [PATCH 6/7] staging: lustre: A few checks less in  mgc_process_recover_log() after error detection SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2015-12-13 15:00 +0100
  [PATCH 5/7] staging: lustre: Less checks in mgc_process_recover_log()  after error detection SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2015-12-13 15:00 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 5/7] staging: lustre: Less checks in  mgc_process_recover_log() after error detection Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> - 2015-12-14 12:10 +0100
      Re: [PATCH 5/7] staging: lustre: Less checks in  mgc_process_recover_log() after error detection SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2015-12-14 13:10 +0100
        Re: [PATCH 5/7] staging: lustre: Less checks in  mgc_process_recover_log() after error detection Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> - 2015-12-14 13:40 +0100
          Re: staging: lustre: Less checks in mgc_process_recover_log() after  error detection SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2015-12-14 13:50 +0100
            Re: staging: lustre: Less checks in mgc_process_recover_log() after  error detection Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> - 2015-12-14 15:00 +0100
              Re: staging: lustre: Less checks in mgc_process_recover_log() after  error detection SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2015-12-14 18:50 +0100
                Re: staging: lustre: Less checks in mgc_process_recover_log() after  error detection Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> - 2015-12-15 12:50 +0100
                Re: staging: lustre: Less checks in mgc_process_recover_log() after  error detection SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2015-12-15 16:10 +0100
  [PATCH 4/7] staging: lustre: Delete an unnecessary variable  initialisation in mgc_process_recover_log() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2015-12-13 15:00 +0100
  [PATCH 7/7] staging: lustre: Rename a jump label for module_put()  calls SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2015-12-13 15:10 +0100
  [PATCH v2 0/4] staging-Lustre: Fine-tuning for some function  implementations SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2015-12-21 20:10 +0100
    [PATCH v2 1/4] staging: lustre: Delete unnecessary goto statements in  six functions SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2015-12-21 20:10 +0100
    [PATCH v2 4/4] staging: lustre: Fix a jump label position in  osc_get_info() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2015-12-21 20:20 +0100
    [PATCH v2 3/4] staging: lustre: Less checks in  mgc_process_recover_log() after error detection SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2015-12-21 20:20 +0100
      Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] staging: lustre: Less checks in  mgc_process_recover_log() after error detection Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2015-12-22 00:50 +0100
        Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] staging: lustre: Less checks in  mgc_process_recover_log() after error detection SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2015-12-22 08:20 +0100
        Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] staging: lustre: Less checks in  mgc_process_recover_log() after error detection Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> - 2015-12-22 09:10 +0100
    [PATCH v2 2/4] staging: lustre: Delete an unnecessary variable  initialisation in mgc_process_recover_log() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2015-12-21 20:20 +0100

csiph-web