Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1291935

Re: sched : performance regression 24% between 4.4rc4 and 4.3 kernel

From Jirka Hladky <jhladky@redhat.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: sched : performance regression 24% between 4.4rc4 and 4.3 kernel
Date 2015-12-15 09:50 +0100
Message-ID <qFTsZ-1AY-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <qEMtz-7sq-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <qETbH-3cH-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qETv4-3kN-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <qFNnA-6aC-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <qFNnA-6aC-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Hi Rik,

I have reviewed the data and you are right. The trouble is that even
with 4.3 kernel there is 20% change that results will be bad. I have
repeated tests 100 times on 4.3 kernel over the night. In 20 cases I
see that runtime went up from 12 seconds to 28 seconds due to the
wrong NUMA placement. I will try to replay the bisect once again.

Jirka

On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 3:12 AM, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 12/14/2015 06:52 PM, Jirka Hladky wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have the results of bisecting:
>>
>> first bad commit: [973759c80db96ed4b4c5cb85ac7d48107f801371] Merge tag
>> 'v4.3-rc1' into sched/core, to refresh the branch
>>
>> Could you please have a look at this commit why it has caused the
>> performance regression when running 4 stream benchmarks in parallel on 4
>> NUMA node server?
>
> That is a merge commit. It contains no actual code changes.
>
>> Please let me know if you need additional data. git bisect log is bellow.
>
> It looks like "git bisect" may have led you astray.
>
> I am not sure what debugging tool to use to figure out which
> of the patches from some merged-in branch caused the issue,
> but hopefully one of the people reading this email know a trick.
>
> --
> All rights reversed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: sched : performance regression 24% between 4.4rc4 and 4.3 kernel Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com> - 2015-12-12 08:10 +0100
  Re: sched : performance regression 24% between 4.4rc4 and 4.3 kernel Jirka Hladky <jhladky@redhat.com> - 2015-12-12 15:20 +0100
    Re: sched : performance regression 24% between 4.4rc4 and 4.3 kernel Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com> - 2015-12-12 15:40 +0100
      Re: sched : performance regression 24% between 4.4rc4 and 4.3 kernel Jirka Hladky <jhladky@redhat.com> - 2015-12-15 01:10 +0100
      Re: sched : performance regression 24% between 4.4rc4 and 4.3 kernel Jirka Hladky <jhladky@redhat.com> - 2015-12-15 01:10 +0100
      Re: sched : performance regression 24% between 4.4rc4 and 4.3 kernel Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> - 2015-12-15 03:20 +0100
        Re: sched : performance regression 24% between 4.4rc4 and 4.3 kernel Jirka Hladky <jhladky@redhat.com> - 2015-12-15 09:50 +0100
          Re: sched : performance regression 24% between 4.4rc4 and 4.3 kernel Jirka Hladky <jhladky@redhat.com> - 2015-12-16 14:00 +0100
            Re: sched : performance regression 24% between 4.4rc4 and 4.3 kernel Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-12-16 15:00 +0100
              Re: sched : performance regression 24% between 4.4rc4 and 4.3 kernel Jirka Hladky <jhladky@redhat.com> - 2015-12-16 18:10 +0100
                Re: sched : performance regression 24% between 4.4rc4 and 4.3 kernel Jirka Hladky <jhladky@redhat.com> - 2015-12-17 16:50 +0100
                Re: sched : performance regression 24% between 4.4rc4 and 4.3 kernel Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com> - 2015-12-18 03:50 +0100

csiph-web