Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1291935
| From | Jirka Hladky <jhladky@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: sched : performance regression 24% between 4.4rc4 and 4.3 kernel |
| Date | 2015-12-15 09:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qFTsZ-1AY-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <qEMtz-7sq-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <qETbH-3cH-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qETv4-3kN-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <qFNnA-6aC-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <qFNnA-6aC-25@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi Rik, I have reviewed the data and you are right. The trouble is that even with 4.3 kernel there is 20% change that results will be bad. I have repeated tests 100 times on 4.3 kernel over the night. In 20 cases I see that runtime went up from 12 seconds to 28 seconds due to the wrong NUMA placement. I will try to replay the bisect once again. Jirka On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 3:12 AM, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> wrote: > On 12/14/2015 06:52 PM, Jirka Hladky wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I have the results of bisecting: >> >> first bad commit: [973759c80db96ed4b4c5cb85ac7d48107f801371] Merge tag >> 'v4.3-rc1' into sched/core, to refresh the branch >> >> Could you please have a look at this commit why it has caused the >> performance regression when running 4 stream benchmarks in parallel on 4 >> NUMA node server? > > That is a merge commit. It contains no actual code changes. > >> Please let me know if you need additional data. git bisect log is bellow. > > It looks like "git bisect" may have led you astray. > > I am not sure what debugging tool to use to figure out which > of the patches from some merged-in branch caused the issue, > but hopefully one of the people reading this email know a trick. > > -- > All rights reversed -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: sched : performance regression 24% between 4.4rc4 and 4.3 kernel Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com> - 2015-12-12 08:10 +0100
Re: sched : performance regression 24% between 4.4rc4 and 4.3 kernel Jirka Hladky <jhladky@redhat.com> - 2015-12-12 15:20 +0100
Re: sched : performance regression 24% between 4.4rc4 and 4.3 kernel Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com> - 2015-12-12 15:40 +0100
Re: sched : performance regression 24% between 4.4rc4 and 4.3 kernel Jirka Hladky <jhladky@redhat.com> - 2015-12-15 01:10 +0100
Re: sched : performance regression 24% between 4.4rc4 and 4.3 kernel Jirka Hladky <jhladky@redhat.com> - 2015-12-15 01:10 +0100
Re: sched : performance regression 24% between 4.4rc4 and 4.3 kernel Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> - 2015-12-15 03:20 +0100
Re: sched : performance regression 24% between 4.4rc4 and 4.3 kernel Jirka Hladky <jhladky@redhat.com> - 2015-12-15 09:50 +0100
Re: sched : performance regression 24% between 4.4rc4 and 4.3 kernel Jirka Hladky <jhladky@redhat.com> - 2015-12-16 14:00 +0100
Re: sched : performance regression 24% between 4.4rc4 and 4.3 kernel Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-12-16 15:00 +0100
Re: sched : performance regression 24% between 4.4rc4 and 4.3 kernel Jirka Hladky <jhladky@redhat.com> - 2015-12-16 18:10 +0100
Re: sched : performance regression 24% between 4.4rc4 and 4.3 kernel Jirka Hladky <jhladky@redhat.com> - 2015-12-17 16:50 +0100
Re: sched : performance regression 24% between 4.4rc4 and 4.3 kernel Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com> - 2015-12-18 03:50 +0100
csiph-web