Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1291716
| From | Jirka Hladky <jhladky@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: sched : performance regression 24% between 4.4rc4 and 4.3 kernel |
| Date | 2015-12-15 01:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qFLlO-4Ut-55@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qEwI9-5Bq-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qEMtz-7sq-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <qETbH-3cH-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qETv4-3kN-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi all, I have the results of bisecting: first bad commit: [973759c80db96ed4b4c5cb85ac7d48107f801371] Merge tag 'v4.3-rc1' into sched/core, to refresh the branch Could you please have a look at this commit why it has caused the performance regression when running 4 stream benchmarks in parallel on 4 NUMA node server? Please let me know if you need additional data. git bisect log is bellow. Thanks a lot! Jirka $ git bisect log git bisect start '--' 'kernel/sched' # good: [6a13feb9c82803e2b815eca72fa7a9f5561d7861] Linux 4.3 git bisect good 6a13feb9c82803e2b815eca72fa7a9f5561d7861 # bad: [527e9316f8ec44bd53d90fb9f611fa7ffff52bb9] Linux 4.4-rc4 git bisect bad 527e9316f8ec44bd53d90fb9f611fa7ffff52bb9 # bad: [b99def8b961448f5b9a550dddeeb718e3975e7a6] sched/core: Rework TASK_DEAD preemption exception git bisect bad b99def8b961448f5b9a550dddeeb718e3975e7a6 # skip: [8cd5601c50603caa195ce86cc465cb04079ed488] sched/fair: Convert arch_scale_cpu_capacity() from weak function to #define git bisect skip 8cd5601c50603caa195ce86cc465cb04079ed488 # bad: [fe19159225d8516f3f57a5fe8f735c01684f0ddd] Merge branch 'sched/urgent' into sched/core, to pick up fixes before applying new changes git bisect bad fe19159225d8516f3f57a5fe8f735c01684f0ddd # bad: [78a9c54649ea220065aad9902460a1d137c7eafd] sched/numa: Rename numabalancing_enabled to sched_numa_balancing git bisect bad 78a9c54649ea220065aad9902460a1d137c7eafd # bad: [6efdb105d392da3ad5cb4ef951aed373cd049813] sched/fair: Fix switched_to_fair()'s per entity load tracking git bisect bad 6efdb105d392da3ad5cb4ef951aed373cd049813 # bad: [50a2a3b246149d041065a67ccb3e98145f780a2f] sched/fair: Have task_move_group_fair() unconditionally add the entity load to the runqueue git bisect bad 50a2a3b246149d041065a67ccb3e98145f780a2f # bad: [973759c80db96ed4b4c5cb85ac7d48107f801371] Merge tag 'v4.3-rc1' into sched/core, to refresh the branch git bisect bad 973759c80db96ed4b4c5cb85ac7d48107f801371 # first bad commit: [973759c80db96ed4b4c5cb85ac7d48107f801371] Merge tag 'v4.3-rc1' into sched/core, to refresh the branch On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, 2015-12-12 at 15:16 +0100, Jirka Hladky wrote: >> > A bisection doesn't require any special skills, but may give busy >> > maintainers a single change to eyeball vs the entire lot. >> >> They have been couple of merges which makes git revert difficult... > > You could try https://git-scm.com/docs/git-bisect instead. > > -Mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: sched : performance regression 24% between 4.4rc4 and 4.3 kernel Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com> - 2015-12-12 08:10 +0100
Re: sched : performance regression 24% between 4.4rc4 and 4.3 kernel Jirka Hladky <jhladky@redhat.com> - 2015-12-12 15:20 +0100
Re: sched : performance regression 24% between 4.4rc4 and 4.3 kernel Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com> - 2015-12-12 15:40 +0100
Re: sched : performance regression 24% between 4.4rc4 and 4.3 kernel Jirka Hladky <jhladky@redhat.com> - 2015-12-15 01:10 +0100
Re: sched : performance regression 24% between 4.4rc4 and 4.3 kernel Jirka Hladky <jhladky@redhat.com> - 2015-12-15 01:10 +0100
Re: sched : performance regression 24% between 4.4rc4 and 4.3 kernel Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> - 2015-12-15 03:20 +0100
Re: sched : performance regression 24% between 4.4rc4 and 4.3 kernel Jirka Hladky <jhladky@redhat.com> - 2015-12-15 09:50 +0100
Re: sched : performance regression 24% between 4.4rc4 and 4.3 kernel Jirka Hladky <jhladky@redhat.com> - 2015-12-16 14:00 +0100
Re: sched : performance regression 24% between 4.4rc4 and 4.3 kernel Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-12-16 15:00 +0100
Re: sched : performance regression 24% between 4.4rc4 and 4.3 kernel Jirka Hladky <jhladky@redhat.com> - 2015-12-16 18:10 +0100
Re: sched : performance regression 24% between 4.4rc4 and 4.3 kernel Jirka Hladky <jhladky@redhat.com> - 2015-12-17 16:50 +0100
Re: sched : performance regression 24% between 4.4rc4 and 4.3 kernel Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com> - 2015-12-18 03:50 +0100
csiph-web