Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1291716

Re: sched : performance regression 24% between 4.4rc4 and 4.3 kernel

From Jirka Hladky <jhladky@redhat.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: sched : performance regression 24% between 4.4rc4 and 4.3 kernel
Date 2015-12-15 01:10 +0100
Message-ID <qFLlO-4Ut-55@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qEwI9-5Bq-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qEMtz-7sq-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <qETbH-3cH-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qETv4-3kN-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Hi all,

I have the results of bisecting:

first bad commit: [973759c80db96ed4b4c5cb85ac7d48107f801371] Merge tag
'v4.3-rc1' into sched/core, to refresh the branch

Could you please have a look at this commit why it has caused the
performance regression when running 4 stream benchmarks in parallel on
4 NUMA node server?

Please let me know if you need additional data. git bisect log is bellow.

Thanks a lot!
Jirka



$ git bisect log
git bisect start '--' 'kernel/sched'
# good: [6a13feb9c82803e2b815eca72fa7a9f5561d7861] Linux 4.3
git bisect good 6a13feb9c82803e2b815eca72fa7a9f5561d7861
# bad: [527e9316f8ec44bd53d90fb9f611fa7ffff52bb9] Linux 4.4-rc4
git bisect bad 527e9316f8ec44bd53d90fb9f611fa7ffff52bb9
# bad: [b99def8b961448f5b9a550dddeeb718e3975e7a6] sched/core: Rework
TASK_DEAD preemption exception
git bisect bad b99def8b961448f5b9a550dddeeb718e3975e7a6
# skip: [8cd5601c50603caa195ce86cc465cb04079ed488] sched/fair: Convert
arch_scale_cpu_capacity() from weak function to #define
git bisect skip 8cd5601c50603caa195ce86cc465cb04079ed488
# bad: [fe19159225d8516f3f57a5fe8f735c01684f0ddd] Merge branch
'sched/urgent' into sched/core, to pick up fixes before applying new
changes
git bisect bad fe19159225d8516f3f57a5fe8f735c01684f0ddd
# bad: [78a9c54649ea220065aad9902460a1d137c7eafd] sched/numa: Rename
numabalancing_enabled to sched_numa_balancing
git bisect bad 78a9c54649ea220065aad9902460a1d137c7eafd
# bad: [6efdb105d392da3ad5cb4ef951aed373cd049813] sched/fair: Fix
switched_to_fair()'s per entity load tracking
git bisect bad 6efdb105d392da3ad5cb4ef951aed373cd049813
# bad: [50a2a3b246149d041065a67ccb3e98145f780a2f] sched/fair: Have
task_move_group_fair() unconditionally add the entity load to the
runqueue
git bisect bad 50a2a3b246149d041065a67ccb3e98145f780a2f
# bad: [973759c80db96ed4b4c5cb85ac7d48107f801371] Merge tag 'v4.3-rc1'
into sched/core, to refresh the branch
git bisect bad 973759c80db96ed4b4c5cb85ac7d48107f801371
# first bad commit: [973759c80db96ed4b4c5cb85ac7d48107f801371] Merge
tag 'v4.3-rc1' into sched/core, to refresh the branch

On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Mike Galbraith
<umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 2015-12-12 at 15:16 +0100, Jirka Hladky wrote:
>> > A bisection doesn't require any special skills, but may give busy
>> > maintainers a single change to eyeball vs the entire lot.
>>
>> They have been couple of merges which makes git revert difficult...
>
> You could try https://git-scm.com/docs/git-bisect instead.
>
>         -Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: sched : performance regression 24% between 4.4rc4 and 4.3 kernel Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com> - 2015-12-12 08:10 +0100
  Re: sched : performance regression 24% between 4.4rc4 and 4.3 kernel Jirka Hladky <jhladky@redhat.com> - 2015-12-12 15:20 +0100
    Re: sched : performance regression 24% between 4.4rc4 and 4.3 kernel Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com> - 2015-12-12 15:40 +0100
      Re: sched : performance regression 24% between 4.4rc4 and 4.3 kernel Jirka Hladky <jhladky@redhat.com> - 2015-12-15 01:10 +0100
      Re: sched : performance regression 24% between 4.4rc4 and 4.3 kernel Jirka Hladky <jhladky@redhat.com> - 2015-12-15 01:10 +0100
      Re: sched : performance regression 24% between 4.4rc4 and 4.3 kernel Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> - 2015-12-15 03:20 +0100
        Re: sched : performance regression 24% between 4.4rc4 and 4.3 kernel Jirka Hladky <jhladky@redhat.com> - 2015-12-15 09:50 +0100
          Re: sched : performance regression 24% between 4.4rc4 and 4.3 kernel Jirka Hladky <jhladky@redhat.com> - 2015-12-16 14:00 +0100
            Re: sched : performance regression 24% between 4.4rc4 and 4.3 kernel Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-12-16 15:00 +0100
              Re: sched : performance regression 24% between 4.4rc4 and 4.3 kernel Jirka Hladky <jhladky@redhat.com> - 2015-12-16 18:10 +0100
                Re: sched : performance regression 24% between 4.4rc4 and 4.3 kernel Jirka Hladky <jhladky@redhat.com> - 2015-12-17 16:50 +0100
                Re: sched : performance regression 24% between 4.4rc4 and 4.3 kernel Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com> - 2015-12-18 03:50 +0100

csiph-web