Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1288919

Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci-acpi: set non-removable in ACPI table

From Philip Elcan <pelcan@codeaurora.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci-acpi: set non-removable in ACPI table
Date 2015-12-10 22:00 +0100
Message-ID <qEgtI-2KO-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qBCqL-5Om-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <qBCTM-6fn-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <qC0Mq-4A2-35@gated-at.bofh.it> <qCZuW-24d-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 12/07/2015 03:30 AM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> On 04/12/15 17:40, Philip Elcan wrote:
>> On 12/03/2015 09:14 AM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
>>> On 03/12/15 15:48, Philip Elcan wrote:
>>>> This allows setting an SDHC controller as non-removable
>>>> by using the _RMV method in the ACPI table. It doesn't
>>> Is that _RMV on the host controller?  Shouldn't it be on the card i.e. child
>>> device node?
>> Yes, this is on the host controller. The ACPI table only describes the
>> host controller, not the child nodes.
>>
> If you look at Intel devices, the _RMV is on the child e.g.
>
>         Device (SDHA)
>         {
>             Name (_HID, "80860F14")  // _HID: Hardware ID
>             Name (_CID, "PNP0D40")  // _CID: Compatible ID
>             Name (_DDN, "Intel(R) eMMC Controller - 80860F14")  // _DDN: DOS Device Name
> 	    ...
>             Device (EMMD)
>             {
> 		...
>                 Method (_RMV, 0, NotSerialized)  // _RMV: Removal Status
>                 {
>                     Return (Zero)
>                 }
>             }
>         }
>
> I am not an ACPI expert but that seems like the correct place for it.
My understanding is that in ACPI you don't generally create child devices on buses that are discoverable.
>
>>>> mark it as non-removable if GPIO card detection is
>>>> already setup.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Philip Elcan <pelcan@codeaurora.org>
>>>> ---
>>>>

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH] mmc: sdhci-acpi: set non-removable in ACPI table Philip Elcan <pelcan@codeaurora.org> - 2015-12-03 14:50 +0100
  Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci-acpi: set non-removable in ACPI table Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> - 2015-12-03 15:20 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci-acpi: set non-removable in ACPI table Philip Elcan <pelcan@codeaurora.org> - 2015-12-04 16:50 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci-acpi: set non-removable in ACPI table Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> - 2015-12-07 09:40 +0100
        Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci-acpi: set non-removable in ACPI table Philip Elcan <pelcan@codeaurora.org> - 2015-12-10 22:00 +0100
          Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci-acpi: set non-removable in ACPI table Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> - 2015-12-11 09:30 +0100
            Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci-acpi: set non-removable in ACPI table "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2015-12-11 23:30 +0100

csiph-web