Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1287777

Re: [patch RESEND] atp870u: 64 bit bug in atp885_init()

From One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [patch RESEND] atp870u: 64 bit bug in atp885_init()
Date 2015-12-09 20:40 +0100
Message-ID <qDSKK-49e-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (3 earlier) <qDNi2-Bz-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <qDNL4-116-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qDR2i-31B-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <qDRvk-3qY-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qDRF0-3u6-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization Intel Corporation

Show all headers | View raw


> You should just delete that code along with the Kconfig and Makefile
> entries.  Don't bother moving it to staging.  The move to staging is
> supposed to give people one last chance to yell if they absolutely need
> the code.  No one has compiled this code for years so no one will miss
> it.

And for stuff which might be worth saving (eg something that looks rather
broken but has possibly got users) the driver goes into staging
in its own directory and the Makefile and Kconfig entry for it move into
the staging directory with the hope that someone screams and maintains it.

Alan

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[patch RESEND] atp870u: 64 bit bug in atp885_init() Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> - 2015-12-09 11:30 +0100
  Re: [patch RESEND] atp870u: 64 bit bug in atp885_init() One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> - 2015-12-09 13:00 +0100
    Re: [patch RESEND] atp870u: 64 bit bug in atp885_init() Ondrej Zary <linux@rainbow-software.org> - 2015-12-09 13:10 +0100
    Re: [patch RESEND] atp870u: 64 bit bug in atp885_init() Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> - 2015-12-09 14:50 +0100
      Re: [patch RESEND] atp870u: 64 bit bug in atp885_init() One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> - 2015-12-09 15:20 +0100
        Re: [patch RESEND] atp870u: 64 bit bug in atp885_init() Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> - 2015-12-09 18:50 +0100
          Re: [patch RESEND] atp870u: 64 bit bug in atp885_init() Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr> - 2015-12-09 19:20 +0100
            Re: [patch RESEND] atp870u: 64 bit bug in atp885_init() Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> - 2015-12-09 19:30 +0100
              Re: [patch RESEND] atp870u: 64 bit bug in atp885_init() One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> - 2015-12-09 20:40 +0100

csiph-web