Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1287688
| From | Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [patch RESEND] atp870u: 64 bit bug in atp885_init() |
| Date | 2015-12-09 18:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qDR2i-31B-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qDKau-75S-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <qDKau-75S-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <qDLzz-7Ue-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <qDNi2-Bz-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <qDNL4-116-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
We should add a tag to indicate that we are sending a patch for a crappy driver. IMHO-this-driver-is-garbage: Your Name <email> If it got 10 votes of no confidence it would be moved to staging and then deleted. Anyway, realistically, let's just apply this fix. It's tempting to think we could delete all atp885 related code, but maybe people are still using it with 32 bit kernels. Or someone could delete it, but I'm not brave enough to be the one to do it. regards, dan carpenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[patch RESEND] atp870u: 64 bit bug in atp885_init() Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> - 2015-12-09 11:30 +0100
Re: [patch RESEND] atp870u: 64 bit bug in atp885_init() One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> - 2015-12-09 13:00 +0100
Re: [patch RESEND] atp870u: 64 bit bug in atp885_init() Ondrej Zary <linux@rainbow-software.org> - 2015-12-09 13:10 +0100
Re: [patch RESEND] atp870u: 64 bit bug in atp885_init() Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> - 2015-12-09 14:50 +0100
Re: [patch RESEND] atp870u: 64 bit bug in atp885_init() One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> - 2015-12-09 15:20 +0100
Re: [patch RESEND] atp870u: 64 bit bug in atp885_init() Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> - 2015-12-09 18:50 +0100
Re: [patch RESEND] atp870u: 64 bit bug in atp885_init() Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr> - 2015-12-09 19:20 +0100
Re: [patch RESEND] atp870u: 64 bit bug in atp885_init() Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> - 2015-12-09 19:30 +0100
Re: [patch RESEND] atp870u: 64 bit bug in atp885_init() One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> - 2015-12-09 20:40 +0100
csiph-web