Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1285526
| From | "zhaoxiu.zeng" <zhaoxiu.zeng@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 04/10] omap_hwspinlock: Replace "hweight_long(i & 0xf) != 1" with "!is_power_of_2(i & 0xf)" |
| Date | 2015-12-07 16:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qD5Ao-6co-53@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qCETv-5Ko-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <qD1Q5-3GX-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
在 2015/12/7 19:08, Ohad Ben-Cohen 写道:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Zhaoxiu Zeng <zhaoxiu.zeng@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> From: Zeng Zhaoxiu <zhaoxiu.zeng@gmail.com>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zeng Zhaoxiu <zhaoxiu.zeng@gmail.com>
>
> Please explain why do you think we should make this change.
is_power_of_2 is simple, and faster than "hweightN(x) == 1" on most architectures.
And the "& 0xf" operation is unnecessary, we will check whether or not greater than 8 behind.
>
> Btw, the original code used is_power_of_2, but we thought hweight is
> more explicit so it was adopted.
>
> Thanks,
> Ohad.
>
---
drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c b/drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c
index ad2f8ca..1848a4c 100644
--- a/drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c
+++ b/drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
#include <linux/hwspinlock.h>
#include <linux/of.h>
#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/log2.h>
#include "hwspinlock_internal.h"
@@ -125,7 +126,7 @@ static int omap_hwspinlock_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
goto iounmap_base;
/* one of the four lsb's must be set, and nothing else */
- if (hweight_long(i & 0xf) != 1 || i > 8) {
+ if (!is_power_of_2(i) || i > 8) {
ret = -EINVAL;
goto iounmap_base;
}
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 04/10] omap_hwspinlock: Replace "hweight_long(i & 0xf) != 1" with "!is_power_of_2(i & 0xf)" Zhaoxiu Zeng <zhaoxiu.zeng@gmail.com> - 2015-12-06 11:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 04/10] omap_hwspinlock: Replace "hweight_long(i & 0xf) != 1" with "!is_power_of_2(i & 0xf)" Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com> - 2015-12-07 12:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 04/10] omap_hwspinlock: Replace "hweight_long(i & 0xf) != 1" with "!is_power_of_2(i & 0xf)" "zhaoxiu.zeng" <zhaoxiu.zeng@gmail.com> - 2015-12-07 16:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 04/10] omap_hwspinlock: Replace "hweight_long(i & 0xf) != 1" with "!is_power_of_2(i & 0xf)" Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com> - 2015-12-07 17:20 +0100
csiph-web