Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1284321

Re: [Patch V0] x86, mce: Ensure offline CPU's don't participate in mce rendezvous process.

From "Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@intel.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [Patch V0] x86, mce: Ensure offline CPU's don't participate in mce rendezvous process.
Date 2015-12-05 00:10 +0100
Message-ID <qC7Ee-I7-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (3 earlier) <qC1Sa-5fB-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <qC2ld-5GD-31@gated-at.bofh.it> <qC2uU-5Kw-61@gated-at.bofh.it> <qC2Od-5RV-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qC7bc-hI-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 02:34:52PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 9:53 AM, Luck, Tony <tony.luck@intel.com> wrote:
> > ist_enter() is black magic to me. Andy? Would you be worried about executing
> > ist_{enter,exit}() on a cpu that was once online, but is currently marked offline
> > by Linux?
> 
> Offline CPUs are black magic to me.  But as long as the CPU works the
> way that the normal specs say it should, then ist_enter is fair game.
> In any event, if context tracking blows up on an offline CPU, I'd
> argue that's a context tracking bug and needs to be fixed.
> 
> But maybe offlined CPUs are supposed to have all interrupts off
> (including MCE?) and the argument goes the other way?  Dunno.

MCE's are broadcast by the hardware and cannot be blocked. Offline
is only a Linux specific state. Now if the offline was a result of an ACPI
event (eject) that triggered the CPU removal (offline in Linux, as it would 
have in a platform that supports true hotplug) then the platform would 
remove this cpu from the broadcast list. 

if kernel were to set CR4.MCE=0 that would cause system shutdown when 
an MCE is broadcast and hits this cpu.

Cheers,
Ashok
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[Patch V0] x86, mce: Ensure offline CPU's don't participate in mce rendezvous process. Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com> - 2015-12-04 00:20 +0100
  Re: [Patch V0] x86, mce: Ensure offline CPU's don't participate in  mce rendezvous process. Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> - 2015-12-04 00:40 +0100
  Re: [Patch V0] x86, mce: Ensure offline CPU's don't participate in  mce rendezvous process. Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2015-12-04 15:40 +0100
    Re: [Patch V0] x86, mce: Ensure offline CPU's don't participate in  mce rendezvous process. "Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@intel.com> - 2015-12-04 17:20 +0100
      Re: [Patch V0] x86, mce: Ensure offline CPU's don't participate in  mce rendezvous process. Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2015-12-04 18:00 +0100
        RE: [Patch V0] x86, mce: Ensure offline CPU's don't participate in  mce rendezvous process. "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com> - 2015-12-04 18:30 +0100
          Re: [Patch V0] x86, mce: Ensure offline CPU's don't participate in  mce rendezvous process. Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2015-12-04 18:40 +0100
            RE: [Patch V0] x86, mce: Ensure offline CPU's don't participate in  mce rendezvous process. "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com> - 2015-12-04 19:00 +0100
              Re: [Patch V0] x86, mce: Ensure offline CPU's don't participate in  mce rendezvous process. Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2015-12-04 19:10 +0100
                RE: [Patch V0] x86, mce: Ensure offline CPU's don't participate in  mce rendezvous process. "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com> - 2015-12-04 19:40 +0100
                Re: [Patch V0] x86, mce: Ensure offline CPU's don't participate in  mce rendezvous process. Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2015-12-04 20:40 +0100
              Re: [Patch V0] x86, mce: Ensure offline CPU's don't participate in  mce rendezvous process. Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2015-12-04 23:40 +0100
                Re: [Patch V0] x86, mce: Ensure offline CPU's don't participate in  mce rendezvous process. "Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@intel.com> - 2015-12-05 00:10 +0100
                Re: [Patch V0] x86, mce: Ensure offline CPU's don't participate in  mce rendezvous process. Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2015-12-05 00:20 +0100

csiph-web