Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1281975

Re: [PATCH 00/13] mvneta Buffer Management and enhancements

From Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 00/13] mvneta Buffer Management and enhancements
Date 2015-12-02 17:30 +0100
Message-ID <qBis3-19N-31@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (2 earlier) <qACMa-7Uc-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <qAT0C-1GT-33@gated-at.bofh.it> <qB0Y9-6H7-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <qB2GC-7Ot-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <qBd90-60F-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Hi,
 
 On mer., déc. 02 2015, Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> wrote:

>>
>> So far the issue may have been not noticed, because in every IO driver
>> using mvebu_mbus_dram_info for configuring MBUS windows, there's
>> following substraction:
>> (cs->size - 1) & 0xfffff000
>>
>> I think there are two options:
>> 1. Change size type to u64.
>
> If we switch to u64 we really must pay attention to be sure that it
> won't be used to be written in a register, but the regsiter remains
> 32bits.
>
>> 2. Change condition in mvebu_mbus_get_dram_win_info to:
>> if (cs->base <= phyaddr && phyaddr <= (cs->base + cs->size -1))
>
> I think it would be the best solution.

So I applied the following patch:
--- a/drivers/bus/mvebu-mbus.c
+++ b/drivers/bus/mvebu-mbus.c
@@ -964,7 +964,7 @@ int mvebu_mbus_get_dram_win_info(phys_addr_t phyaddr, u8 *target, u8 *attr)
        for (i = 0; i < dram->num_cs; i++) {
                const struct mbus_dram_window *cs = dram->cs + i;
 
-               if (cs->base <= phyaddr && phyaddr <= (cs->base + cs->size)) {
+               if (cs->base <= phyaddr && phyaddr <= (cs->base + cs->size - 1)) {
                        *target = dram->mbus_dram_target_id;
                        *attr = cs->mbus_attr;
                        return 0;

I didn't get any errors during boot related to the BM. However I did not
manage to use an ethernet interface. The udhcpc never managed to get an
IP and if I set the IP manually I could not ping.

But on Armada 388 GP I didn't have any issue.

Do you have some idea about waht I could check?

Gregory


-- 
Gregory Clement, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH 00/13] mvneta Buffer Management and enhancements Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> - 2015-11-30 18:20 +0100
  Re: [PATCH 00/13] mvneta Buffer Management and enhancements Marcin Wojtas <mw@semihalf.com> - 2015-11-30 21:00 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 00/13] mvneta Buffer Management and enhancements Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> - 2015-12-01 14:20 +0100
      Re: [PATCH 00/13] mvneta Buffer Management and enhancements Marcin Wojtas <mw@semihalf.com> - 2015-12-01 22:50 +0100
        Re: [PATCH 00/13] mvneta Buffer Management and enhancements Marcin Wojtas <mw@semihalf.com> - 2015-12-02 00:40 +0100
          Re: [PATCH 00/13] mvneta Buffer Management and enhancements Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> - 2015-12-02 11:50 +0100
            Re: [PATCH 00/13] mvneta Buffer Management and enhancements Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> - 2015-12-02 17:30 +0100
              Re: [PATCH 00/13] mvneta Buffer Management and enhancements Marcin Wojtas <mw@semihalf.com> - 2015-12-02 23:20 +0100
                Re: [PATCH 00/13] mvneta Buffer Management and enhancements Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> - 2015-12-03 00:00 +0100

csiph-web