Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1283132
| From | Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 3/4] dmaengine: core: Introduce new, universal API to request a channel |
| Date | 2015-12-03 16:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qBE9c-6XG-23@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qBDd8-6lI-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qBDd8-6lI-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thursday 03 December 2015 16:33:11 Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> +
> +/**
> + * dma_request_chan - try to allocate an exclusive slave channel
> + * @dev: pointer to client device structure
> + * @name: slave channel name
> + *
> + * Returns pointer to appropriate DMA channel on success or an error pointer.
> + */
> +struct dma_chan *dma_request_chan(struct device *dev, const char *name)
> +{
> + struct dma_device *d, *_d;
> + struct dma_chan *chan = NULL;
> +
> + /* If device-tree is present get slave info from here */
> + if (dev->of_node)
> + chan = of_dma_request_slave_channel(dev->of_node, name);
> +
> + /* If device was enumerated by ACPI get slave info from here */
> + if (has_acpi_companion(dev) && !chan)
> + chan = acpi_dma_request_slave_chan_by_name(dev, name);
I just noticed that you are creating this as a new interface, rather than
changing dma_request_slave_channel_reason() and making the old interface
a static inline wrapper. What is the reasoning behind that?
I think if we make both interfaces do the same thing, it's easier
to do the migration.
> + if (chan) {
> + /* Valid channel found */
> + if (!IS_ERR(chan) || PTR_ERR(chan) == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> + return chan;
> +
> + pr_warn("%s: %s DMA request failed, falling back to legacy\n",
> + __func__, dev->of_node ? "OF" : "ACPI");
> + }
Maybe print the error code as well?
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 0/4] dmaengine: New 'universal' API for requesting channel Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> - 2015-12-03 15:40 +0100
[PATCH 4/4] dmaengine: edma: Add support for DMA filter mapping to slave devices Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> - 2015-12-03 15:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 4/4] dmaengine: edma: Add support for DMA filter mapping to slave devices Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2015-12-03 16:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 4/4] dmaengine: edma: Add support for DMA filter mapping to slave devices Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> - 2015-12-03 16:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 4/4] dmaengine: edma: Add support for DMA filter mapping to slave devices Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> - 2015-12-08 14:20 +0100
[PATCH 3/4] dmaengine: core: Introduce new, universal API to request a channel Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> - 2015-12-03 15:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 3/4] dmaengine: core: Introduce new, universal API to request a channel Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2015-12-03 16:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 3/4] dmaengine: core: Introduce new, universal API to request a channel Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2015-12-03 16:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 3/4] dmaengine: core: Introduce new, universal API to request a channel Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> - 2015-12-03 16:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 3/4] dmaengine: core: Introduce new, universal API to request a channel Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> - 2015-12-03 17:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 0/4] dmaengine: New 'universal' API for requesting channel Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> - 2015-12-03 17:40 +0100
csiph-web