Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1281359

Re: [PATCH 3/3] Addition of binding for firmware signals on peach-pi

From Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 3/3] Addition of binding for firmware signals on peach-pi
Date 2015-12-02 01:00 +0100
Message-ID <qB2ZY-7VO-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qAYD0-5ha-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <qAYD0-5ha-23@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 02.12.2015 04:12, Martyn Welch wrote:
> The peach pi has a GPIO connected to the firmware write protect, developer
> mode and recovery mode lines. This patch adds the required nodes to the
> device tree to configure the pinmuxing and allow these to be read from
> user space.
> 
> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
> Cc: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Cc: Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>
> Cc: Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>
> Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>
> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
> Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Martyn Welch <martyn.welch@collabora.co.uk>
> ---
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800-peach-pi.dts | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 40 insertions(+)

Hi,

Thanks for the patch.

Few points from my side:
1. Please add a prefix to the subject: "ARM: dts:".

2. There is no need of such huge CC-list in the body of commit. This
CC-list comes from get_maintainer so there is no benefit of duplicating
it here. The CC is usually used to notify other people who might be
interested but get_maintainer does not point them.

3. I received only this third patch. I did not receive cover letter
explaining possible dependencies so I am not sure how to deal with the
patch. It looks like there are no dependencies... but maybe there are?
Is this is a new binding or no? Please provide a cover letter (if it
exists already be sure to send it to all interested parties) or send
entire patchset so the big picture could be seen.

The patch itself looks good but I'll wait with a review tag for #3.

Best regards,
Krzysztof


> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800-peach-pi.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800-peach-pi.dts
> index 49a4f43..485c18f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800-peach-pi.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800-peach-pi.dts
> @@ -53,6 +53,25 @@
>  		};
>  	};
>  
> +	chromeos-firmware {
> +		compatible = "google,gpio-firmware";
> +
> +		pinctrl-names = "default";
> +		pinctrl-0 = <&wp_gpio &dev_mode &rec_mode>;
> +
> +		write-protect {
> +			gpios = <&gpx3 0 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> +		};
> +
> +		developer-switch {
> +			gpios = <&gpx1 3 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> +		};
> +
> +		recovery-switch {
> +			gpios = <&gpx0 7 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> +		};
> +	};
> +
>  	gpio-keys {
>  		compatible = "gpio-keys";
>  
> @@ -731,6 +750,13 @@
>  		samsung,pin-val = <0>;
>  	};
>  
> +	rec_mode: rec-mode {
> +		samsung,pins = "gpx0-7";
> +		samsung,pin-function = <0>;
> +		samsung,pin-pud = <0>;
> +		samsung,pin-drv = <0>;
> +	};
> +
>  	tpm_irq: tpm-irq {
>  		samsung,pins = "gpx1-0";
>  		samsung,pin-function = <0>;
> @@ -752,6 +778,13 @@
>  		samsung,pin-drv = <0>;
>  	};
>  
> +	dev_mode: dev-mode {
> +		samsung,pins = "gpx1-3";
> +		samsung,pin-function = <0>;
> +		samsung,pin-pud = <3>;
> +		samsung,pin-drv = <0>;
> +	};
> +
>  	ec_irq: ec-irq {
>  		samsung,pins = "gpx1-5";
>  		samsung,pin-function = <0>;
> @@ -773,6 +806,13 @@
>  		samsung,pin-drv = <0>;
>  	};
>  
> +	wp_gpio: wp_gpio {
> +		samsung,pins = "gpx3-0";
> +		samsung,pin-function = <0>;
> +		samsung,pin-pud = <0>;
> +		samsung,pin-drv = <0>;
> +	};
> +
>  	max77802_irq: max77802-irq {
>  		samsung,pins = "gpx3-1";
>  		samsung,pin-function = <0>;
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Add support for Chrome OS firmware signals Martyn Welch <martyn.welch@collabora.co.uk> - 2015-12-01 20:20 +0100
  [PATCH 2/3] Add support for monitoring Chrome OS firmware signals Martyn Welch <martyn.welch@collabora.co.uk> - 2015-12-01 20:20 +0100
    [PATCH v2] Add support for monitoring Chrome OS firmware signals Martyn Welch <martyn.welch@collabora.co.uk> - 2015-12-01 21:30 +0100
      Re: [PATCH v2] Add support for monitoring Chrome OS firmware signals Jeremiah Mahler <jmmahler@gmail.com> - 2015-12-02 07:10 +0100
        Re: [PATCH v2] Add support for monitoring Chrome OS firmware signals Martyn Welch <martyn.welch@collabora.co.uk> - 2015-12-02 10:40 +0100
        [PATCH v3] Add support for monitoring Chrome OS firmware signals Martyn Welch <martyn.welch@collabora.co.uk> - 2015-12-02 11:10 +0100
  [PATCH 3/3] Addition of binding for firmware signals on peach-pi Martyn Welch <martyn.welch@collabora.co.uk> - 2015-12-01 20:20 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 3/3] Addition of binding for firmware signals on peach-pi Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> - 2015-12-02 01:00 +0100
      Re: [PATCH 3/3] Addition of binding for firmware signals on peach-pi Martyn Welch <martyn.welch@collabora.co.uk> - 2015-12-02 10:40 +0100
        Re: [PATCH 3/3] Addition of binding for firmware signals on peach-pi Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> - 2015-12-03 01:20 +0100

csiph-web