Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1279936

Re: [PATCH 4/4] ARM: dt: mvebu: ix4-300d: Add ECC properties to NAND flash

From Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 4/4] ARM: dt: mvebu: ix4-300d: Add ECC properties to NAND flash
Date 2015-11-30 15:30 +0100
Message-ID <qAxCN-4L7-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qzLHQ-8cc-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <qzLHQ-8cc-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qAbiV-7ji-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <qAsa6-1cU-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Hi Sebastian,
 
 On lun., nov. 30 2015, Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 29.11.2015 15:35, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
>> Adding Ezequiel Garcia in Cc.
>>
>> On Sat, 28 Nov 2015 12:14:08 +0100, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
>>> The NAND device found on Lenovo ix4-300d uses 4-bit BCH ECC protection.
>>> Add the corresponding properties to the NAND node.
>>
>> If the ONFI information from the NAND flash say that it requires 4 bits
>> per 512, then there should be no need to add this information to the
>> Device Tree as the pxa3xx_nand driver by default uses the ONFI
>> information.
>
> Thomas,
>
> as said in the cover letter, this is also DT cleanup with barebox
> bootloader in mind. I do not accept what Linux' pxa3xx_nand driver
> is doing as a reference here ;)
>
>> Those properties are only needed when for some reason the vendor has
>> chosen to use a ECC strength that doesn't match with the one advertised
>> by the flash in its ONFI information (either stronger or weaker). But
>> in this case, your commit log is confusing, because it says that the
>> "NAND device ... uses 4-bit BCH ECC protection". If it really does,
>> then the patch is not needed :-)
>
> I agree that if ONFI is already advertising 4/512 ECC (and it is), we
> do not need the properties. Anyway, IIRC barebox does not yet properly
> parse ONFI or at least it does not derive minimum ECC settings from it.
>
> I'll have to have a closer look at barebox' ONFI parsing capabilites
> and can live with this patch not applied even though it does no harm.

So for now, I don't apply it.

Thanks,

Gregory

-- 
Gregory Clement, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH 0/4] ARM: dt: mvebu: ix4-300d: NAND cleanup and ECC Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com> - 2015-11-28 12:20 +0100
  [PATCH 4/4] ARM: dt: mvebu: ix4-300d: Add ECC properties to NAND flash Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com> - 2015-11-28 12:20 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 4/4] ARM: dt: mvebu: ix4-300d: Add ECC properties to NAND  flash Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> - 2015-11-28 18:10 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 4/4] ARM: dt: mvebu: ix4-300d: Add ECC properties to  NAND flash Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> - 2015-11-29 15:40 +0100
      Re: [PATCH 4/4] ARM: dt: mvebu: ix4-300d: Add ECC properties to NAND  flash Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com> - 2015-11-30 09:40 +0100
        Re: [PATCH 4/4] ARM: dt: mvebu: ix4-300d: Add ECC properties to NAND flash Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> - 2015-11-30 15:30 +0100
  [PATCH 3/4] ARM: dt: mvebu: ix4-300d: Cleanup NAND partition ranges Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com> - 2015-11-28 12:20 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 3/4] ARM: dt: mvebu: ix4-300d: Cleanup NAND partition  ranges Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> - 2015-11-28 18:10 +0100
      Re: [PATCH 3/4] ARM: dt: mvebu: ix4-300d: Cleanup NAND partition ranges Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> - 2015-11-30 15:30 +0100
  [PATCH 1/4] ARM: dt: mvebu: ix4-300d: remove whole flash partition Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com> - 2015-11-28 12:20 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 1/4] ARM: dt: mvebu: ix4-300d: remove whole flash  partition Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> - 2015-11-28 18:00 +0100
      Re: [PATCH 1/4] ARM: dt: mvebu: ix4-300d: remove whole flash  partition Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com> - 2015-11-28 18:40 +0100
        Re: [PATCH 1/4] ARM: dt: mvebu: ix4-300d: remove whole flash partition Benoit Masson <benoitm@perenite.com> - 2015-11-28 21:40 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 1/4] ARM: dt: mvebu: ix4-300d: remove whole flash  partition Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> - 2015-11-28 22:20 +0100
      Re: [PATCH 1/4] ARM: dt: mvebu: ix4-300d: remove whole flash partition Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> - 2015-11-30 15:20 +0100
  [PATCH 2/4] ARM: dt: mvebu: ix4-300d: move partitions to partition sub-node Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com> - 2015-11-28 12:20 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 2/4] ARM: dt: mvebu: ix4-300d: move partitions to  partition sub-node Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> - 2015-11-28 18:10 +0100
      Re: [PATCH 2/4] ARM: dt: mvebu: ix4-300d: move partitions to  partition sub-node Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com> - 2015-11-28 18:40 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 2/4] ARM: dt: mvebu: ix4-300d: move partitions to partition sub-node Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> - 2015-11-30 15:20 +0100

csiph-web