Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1227631
| From | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: single_task_running() vs. preemption warnings (was Re: [PATCH] kvm: fix preemption warnings in kvm_vcpu_block) |
| Date | 2015-09-18 10:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <q9YKm-4Mg-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <q9Ken-yZ-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <q9KxI-W9-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <q9KR5-1yz-41@gated-at.bofh.it> <q9OhX-6wj-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 01:32:55PM -0700, Tim Chen wrote:
> I have no objection to change single_task_running to use
> raw_smp_processor_id. The worker in mcryptd is bound to
> the cpu so it has no migration/preemption issue. So it shouldn't care
> which smp_processor_id version is being used. Yes, please add a comment
> to alert the user of this caveat should you change single_task_running.
We actually have raw_rq() for that, and the whole if thing looks rather
superfluous. So something like the below, except with a suitable comment
on and tested etc.. ;-)
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 5 +----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 6ab415aa15c4..f39c0498e284 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -2666,10 +2666,7 @@ unsigned long nr_running(void)
*/
bool single_task_running(void)
{
- if (cpu_rq(smp_processor_id())->nr_running == 1)
- return true;
- else
- return false;
+ return raw_rq()->nr_running == 1;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(single_task_running);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] kvm: fix preemption warnings in kvm_vcpu_block Dominik Dingel <dingel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2015-09-17 18:30 +0200
single_task_running() vs. preemption warnings (was Re: [PATCH] kvm: fix preemption warnings in kvm_vcpu_block) Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2015-09-17 18:50 +0200
Re: single_task_running() vs. preemption warnings (was Re: [PATCH] kvm: fix preemption warnings in kvm_vcpu_block) Dominik Dingel <dingel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2015-09-17 19:10 +0200
Re: single_task_running() vs. preemption warnings (was Re: [PATCH] kvm: fix preemption warnings in kvm_vcpu_block) Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> - 2015-09-17 22:50 +0200
Re: single_task_running() vs. preemption warnings (was Re: [PATCH] kvm: fix preemption warnings in kvm_vcpu_block) Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-09-18 10:00 +0200
csiph-web