Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1227263
| From | Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: Failover root devices |
| Date | 2015-09-17 20:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <q9LDs-2vw-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <q9FRq-2rZ-41@gated-at.bofh.it> <q9G13-2Dx-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <q9LtM-2jP-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <q9LtN-2jP-27@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Am 17.09.2015 um 19:49 schrieb Drew DeVault: >> I really don't see why we need this feature in-kernel as it can be >> done perfectly fine >> in userspace. Every non-trivial system needs an initramfs anyway these days. > > Most initramfs systems will parse the root= line of your kernel command line and use it to remount root. The kernel seems like the best place to establish this, since the various > initramfs solutions will implement the same format just to support parsing the kernel command line correctly. I mean, maybe that's not enough to justify putting it in the kernel, > but that's why I see the kernel as the appropriate place to implement this feature. Better send a patch to dracut folks. :-) Major distros use it and if the feature is nice other initramfs implementations will adopt it too. Thanks, //richard -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Failover root devices Ortwin Glück <odi@odi.ch> - 2015-09-17 13:50 +0200
Re: Failover root devices Drew DeVault <sir@cmpwn.com> - 2015-09-17 14:00 +0200
Re: Failover root devices Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 19:50 +0200
Re: Failover root devices Drew DeVault <sir@cmpwn.com> - 2015-09-17 19:50 +0200
Re: Failover root devices Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> - 2015-09-17 20:00 +0200
Re: Failover root devices Drew DeVault <sir@cmpwn.com> - 2015-09-17 20:10 +0200
Re: Failover root devices Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> - 2015-09-17 20:20 +0200
Re: Failover root devices Drew DeVault <sir@cmpwn.com> - 2015-09-17 20:20 +0200
Re: Failover root devices Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> - 2015-09-17 20:20 +0200
Re: Failover root devices Drew DeVault <sir@cmpwn.com> - 2015-09-17 20:30 +0200
Re: Failover root devices Drew DeVault <sir@cmpwn.com> - 2015-09-17 20:30 +0200
Re: Failover root devices Ortwin Glück <odi@odi.ch> - 2015-09-18 17:00 +0200
Re: Failover root devices Drew DeVault <sir@cmpwn.com> - 2015-09-18 17:10 +0200
Re: Failover root devices Ortwin Glück <odi@odi.ch> - 2015-09-18 17:10 +0200
Re: Failover root devices Austin S Hemmelgarn <ahferroin7@gmail.com> - 2015-09-18 17:40 +0200
Re: Failover root devices Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> - 2015-09-17 20:30 +0200
Re: Failover root devices Harald Hoyer <harald.hoyer@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 20:30 +0200
Re: Failover root devices Drew DeVault <sir@cmpwn.com> - 2015-09-17 20:30 +0200
Re: Failover root devices Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> - 2015-09-17 20:40 +0200
Re: Failover root devices Drew DeVault <sir@cmpwn.com> - 2015-09-17 20:40 +0200
Re: Failover root devices Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> - 2015-09-17 20:50 +0200
Re: Failover root devices Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> - 2015-09-17 20:30 +0200
Re: Failover root devices Austin S Hemmelgarn <ahferroin7@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 20:40 +0200
Re: Failover root devices Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> - 2015-09-17 20:50 +0200
Re: Failover root devices Austin S Hemmelgarn <ahferroin7@gmail.com> - 2015-09-18 16:50 +0200
csiph-web