Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1222911
| From | Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: Multiple potential races on vma->vm_flags |
| Date | 2015-09-11 17:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <q7yr0-5BA-27@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <q635U-4u5-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <q6Ynw-2Kg-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <q75yI-4zn-51@gated-at.bofh.it> <q7a5k-2Ey-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <q7u41-7zp-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 09/11/2015 12:39 PM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 03:27:59PM +0200, Andrey Konovalov wrote: >> Can a vma be shared among a few mm's? > > Define "shared". > > vma can belong only to one process (mm_struct), but it can be accessed > from other process like in rmap case below. > > rmap uses anon_vma_lock for anon vma and i_mmap_rwsem for file vma to make > sure that the vma will not disappear under it. > >> If yes, then taking current->mm->mmap_sem to protect vma is not enough. > > Depends on what protection you are talking about. > >> In the first report below both T378 and T398 take >> current->mm->mmap_sem at mm/mlock.c:650, but they turn out to be >> different locks (the addresses are different). > > See i_mmap_lock_read() in T398. It will guarantee that vma is there. > >> In the second report T309 doesn't take any locks at all, since it >> assumes that after checking atomic_dec_and_test(&mm->mm_users) the mm >> has no other users, but then it does a write to vma. > > This one is tricky. I *assume* the mm cannot be generally accessible after > mm_users drops to zero, but I'm not entirely sure about it. > procfs? ptrace? > > The VMA is still accessible via rmap at this point. And I think it can be > a problem: > > CPU0 CPU1 > exit_mmap() > // mmap_sem is *not* taken > munlock_vma_pages_all() > munlock_vma_pages_range() > try_to_unmap_one() > down_read_trylock(&vma->vm_mm->mmap_sem)) > !!(vma->vm_flags & VM_LOCKED) == true > vma->vm_flags &= ~VM_LOCKED; > <munlock the page> > mlock_vma_page(page); > // mlocked pages is leaked. > > The obvious solution is to take mmap_sem in exit path, but it would cause > performance regression. > > Any comments? Just so others don't repeat the paths that I already looked at: - First I thought that try_to_unmap_one() has the page locked and munlock_vma_pages_range() will also lock it... but it doesn't. - Then I thought that exit_mmap() will revisit the page anyway doing actual unmap. It would, if it's the one who has the page mapped, it will clear the mlock (see page_remove_rmap()). If it's not the last one, page will be left locked. So it won't be completely leaked, but still, it will be mlocked when it shouldn't. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Multiple potential races on vma->vm_flags "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> - 2015-09-07 13:50 +0200
Re: Multiple potential races on vma->vm_flags Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> - 2015-09-09 17:30 +0200
Re: Multiple potential races on vma->vm_flags "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> - 2015-09-09 18:10 +0200
Re: Multiple potential races on vma->vm_flags Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com> - 2015-09-10 03:00 +0200
Re: Multiple potential races on vma->vm_flags "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> - 2015-09-10 10:40 +0200
Re: Multiple potential races on vma->vm_flags Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com> - 2015-09-10 15:30 +0200
Re: Multiple potential races on vma->vm_flags "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> - 2015-09-11 12:50 +0200
Re: Multiple potential races on vma->vm_flags Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> - 2015-09-11 17:30 +0200
Re: Multiple potential races on vma->vm_flags Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> - 2015-09-11 18:10 +0200
Re: Multiple potential races on vma->vm_flags Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> - 2015-09-12 03:30 +0200
Re: Multiple potential races on vma->vm_flags "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> - 2015-09-14 12:20 +0200
Re: Multiple potential races on vma->vm_flags Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com> - 2015-09-15 19:40 +0200
Re: Multiple potential races on vma->vm_flags "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> - 2015-09-15 21:10 +0200
csiph-web