Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1221705
| From | Paul Moore <pmoore@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH V1] audit: add warning that an old auditd may be starved out by a new auditd |
| Date | 2015-09-09 23:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <q6UDg-5Q3-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <q67Me-2Kt-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <q67VU-2VX-35@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | Red Hat |
On Monday, September 07, 2015 12:58:18 PM Richard Guy Briggs wrote: > On 15/09/07, Richard Guy Briggs wrote: > > Nothing prevents a new auditd starting up and replacing a valid > > audit_pid when an old auditd is still running, effectively starving out > > the old auditd since audit_pid no longer points to the old valid auditd. > > > > There isn't an easy way to detect if an old auditd is still running on > > the existing audit_pid other than attempting to send a message to see if > > it fails. If no message to auditd has been attempted since auditd died > > unnaturally or got killed, audit_pid will still indicate it is alive. > > > > Signed-off-by: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com> > > Ok, self-nack on this one for a couple of problems... > netlink_getsockbyportid() is static to af_netlink.c and "pid" should be > task_tgid_vnr(current). Otherwise, any opinions on this approach? > > > --- > > Note: Would it be too bold to actually block the registration of a new > > auditd if the netlink_getsockbyportid() call succeeded? Would other > > checks be appropriate? Hmm. It seems like we should prevent the registration of a new auditd if we already have an auditd instance connected, although as you say, that isn't the easiest thing to do. How painful would it be to return -EAGAIN to the new auditd while sending some sort of keep-alive/ping/etc. message to the old daemon to check its status? -- paul moore security @ redhat -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH V1] audit: add warning that an old auditd may be starved out by a new auditd Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com> - 2015-09-07 18:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH V1] audit: add warning that an old auditd may be starved out by a new auditd Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com> - 2015-09-07 19:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH V1] audit: add warning that an old auditd may be starved out by a new auditd Paul Moore <pmoore@redhat.com> - 2015-09-09 23:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH V1] audit: add warning that an old auditd may be starved out by a new auditd Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com> - 2015-09-11 12:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH V1] audit: add warning that an old auditd may be starved out by a new auditd Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> - 2015-09-11 21:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH V1] audit: add warning that an old auditd may be starved out by a new auditd Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com> - 2015-09-13 18:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH V1] audit: add warning that an old auditd may be starved out by a new auditd Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> - 2015-09-14 21:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH V1] audit: add warning that an old auditd may be starved out by a new auditd Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com> - 2015-09-16 12:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH V1] audit: add warning that an old auditd may be starved out by a new auditd Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> - 2015-09-16 23:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH V1] audit: add warning that an old auditd may be starved out by a new auditd Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com> - 2015-09-17 13:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH V1] audit: add warning that an old auditd may be starved out by a new auditd Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> - 2015-09-18 00:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH V1] audit: add warning that an old auditd may be starved out by a new auditd Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com> - 2015-09-08 17:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH V1] audit: add warning that an old auditd may be starved out by a new auditd Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com> - 2015-09-09 08:40 +0200
csiph-web