Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1220332

[PATCH V1] audit: add warning that an old auditd may be starved out by a new auditd

Show all headers | View raw

Nothing prevents a new auditd starting up and replacing a valid
audit_pid when an old auditd is still running, effectively starving out
the old auditd since audit_pid no longer points to the old valid auditd.

There isn't an easy way to detect if an old auditd is still running on
the existing audit_pid other than attempting to send a message to see if
it fails.  If no message to auditd has been attempted since auditd died
unnaturally or got killed, audit_pid will still indicate it is alive.

Signed-off-by: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>
---
Note: Would it be too bold to actually block the registration of a new
auditd if the netlink_getsockbyportid() call succeeded?  Would other
checks be appropriate?

 kernel/audit.c |    5 +++++
 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/audit.c b/kernel/audit.c
index 18cdfe2..1fa1e0d 100644
--- a/kernel/audit.c
+++ b/kernel/audit.c
@@ -872,6 +872,11 @@ static int audit_receive_msg(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh)
 		if (s.mask & AUDIT_STATUS_PID) {
 			int new_pid = s.pid;
 
+			if (audit_pid && new_pid &&
+			    !IS_ERR(netlink_getsockbyportid(audit_sock, audit_nlk_portid)))
+				pr_warn("auditd replaced by new auditd before normal shutdown: "
+					"(old)audit_pid=%d (by)pid=%d new_pid=%d",
+					audit_pid, pid, new_pid);
 			if ((!new_pid) && (task_tgid_vnr(current) != audit_pid))
 				return -EACCES;
 			if (audit_enabled != AUDIT_OFF)
-- 
1.7.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[PATCH V1] audit: add warning that an old auditd may be starved out by a new auditd Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com> - 2015-09-07 18:50 +0200
  Re: [PATCH V1] audit: add warning that an old auditd may be starved  out by a new auditd Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com> - 2015-09-07 19:00 +0200
    Re: [PATCH V1] audit: add warning that an old auditd may be starved out by a new auditd Paul Moore <pmoore@redhat.com> - 2015-09-09 23:00 +0200
      Re: [PATCH V1] audit: add warning that an old auditd may be starved  out by a new auditd Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com> - 2015-09-11 12:30 +0200
        Re: [PATCH V1] audit: add warning that an old auditd may be starved  out by a new auditd Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> - 2015-09-11 21:00 +0200
          Re: [PATCH V1] audit: add warning that an old auditd may be starved  out by a new auditd Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com> - 2015-09-13 18:10 +0200
            Re: [PATCH V1] audit: add warning that an old auditd may be starved out by a new auditd Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> - 2015-09-14 21:40 +0200
              Re: [PATCH V1] audit: add warning that an old auditd may be starved  out by a new auditd Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com> - 2015-09-16 12:30 +0200
                Re: [PATCH V1] audit: add warning that an old auditd may be starved  out by a new auditd Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> - 2015-09-16 23:50 +0200
                Re: [PATCH V1] audit: add warning that an old auditd may be starved  out by a new auditd Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com> - 2015-09-17 13:40 +0200
                Re: [PATCH V1] audit: add warning that an old auditd may be starved  out by a new auditd Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> - 2015-09-18 00:50 +0200
  Re: [PATCH V1] audit: add warning that an old auditd may be starved  out by a new auditd Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com> - 2015-09-08 17:00 +0200
    Re: [PATCH V1] audit: add warning that an old auditd may be starved  out by a new auditd Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com> - 2015-09-09 08:40 +0200

csiph-web