Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1221412
| From | Emilio López <emilio.lopez@collabora.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/3] sysfs: Fix is_visible() support for binary attributes |
| Date | 2015-09-09 15:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <q6Ns6-48j-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <q6wUi-5nt-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <q6BTY-434-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <q6Cdj-4EY-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <q6EI9-89L-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <q6F1v-jD-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 09/09/15 01:12, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 09/08/2015 08:58 PM, Greg KH wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 06:10:16PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: >>> Hi Emilio, >>> >>> On 09/08/2015 05:51 PM, Emilio López wrote: >>>> Hi Greg & Guenter, >>>> >>> [ ... ] >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Unless I am missing something, this is not explained anywhere, >>>>>>> but it is >>>>>>> not entirely trivial to understand. I think it should be documented. >>>> >>>> I agree. I couldn't find any mention of what this int was supposed >>>> to be by looking at Documentation/ (is_visible is not even mentioned >>>> :/) or include/linux/sysfs.h. Once we settle on something I'll >>>> document it before sending a v2. >>>> >>> In the include file ? No strong preference, though. >>> >>>> By the way, I wrote a quick coccinelle script to match is_visible() >>>> users which reference the index (included below), and it found >>>> references to drivers which do not seem to use any binary >>>> attributes, so I believe changing the index meaning shouldn't be an >>>> issue. >>>> >>> Good. >>> >>>>>> I agree, make i the number of the bin attribute and that should solve >>>>>> this issue. >>>>>> >>>>> No, that would conflict with the "normal" use of is_visible for >>>>> non-binary >>>>> attributes, and make the index all but useless, since the >>>>> is_visible function >>>>> would have to search through all the attributes anyway to figure >>>>> out which one >>>>> is being checked. >>>> >>>> Yeah, using the same indexes would be somewhat pointless, although >>>> not many seem to be using it anyway (only 14 files matched). Others >>>> seem to be comparing the attr* instead. An alternative would be to >>>> use negative indexes for binary attributes and positive indexes for >>>> normal attributes. >>>> >>> ... and I probably wrote or reviewed a significant percentage of >>> those ;-). >>> >>> Using negative numbers for binary attributes is an interesting idea. >>> Kind of unusual, though. Greg, any thoughts on that ? >> >> Ick, no, that's a mess, maybe we just could drop the index alltogether? >> > > No, please don't. Having to manually compare dozens of index pointers > would be > even more of a mess. So, what about keeping it the way it is in the patch, and documenting it thoroughly? Otherwise, we could introduce another "is_bin_visible" function to do this same thing but just on binary attributes, but I'd rather not add a new function pointer if possible. Cheers, Emilio -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 1/3] sysfs: Fix is_visible() support for binary attributes Emilio López <emilio.lopez@collabora.co.uk> - 2015-09-08 14:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/3] sysfs: Fix is_visible() support for binary attributes Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2015-09-08 17:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/3] sysfs: Fix is_visible() support for binary attributes Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2015-09-08 21:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/3] sysfs: Fix is_visible() support for binary attributes Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2015-09-08 21:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/3] sysfs: Fix is_visible() support for binary attributes Emilio López <emilio.lopez@collabora.co.uk> - 2015-09-09 03:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/3] sysfs: Fix is_visible() support for binary attributes Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2015-09-09 03:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/3] sysfs: Fix is_visible() support for binary attributes Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2015-09-09 06:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/3] sysfs: Fix is_visible() support for binary attributes Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2015-09-09 06:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/3] sysfs: Fix is_visible() support for binary attributes Emilio López <emilio.lopez@collabora.co.uk> - 2015-09-09 15:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/3] sysfs: Fix is_visible() support for binary attributes Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2015-09-09 15:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/3] sysfs: Fix is_visible() support for binary attributes Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2015-09-09 20:30 +0200
csiph-web