Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1221225

Re: [PATCH 1/3] sysfs: Fix is_visible() support for binary attributes

From Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 1/3] sysfs: Fix is_visible() support for binary attributes
Date 2015-09-09 06:20 +0200
Message-ID <q6F1v-jD-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (3 earlier) <q6wAW-50C-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <q6wUi-5nt-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <q6BTY-434-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <q6Cdj-4EY-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <q6EI9-89L-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 09/08/2015 08:58 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 06:10:16PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> Hi Emilio,
>>
>> On 09/08/2015 05:51 PM, Emilio López wrote:
>>> Hi Greg & Guenter,
>>>
>> [ ... ]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Unless I am missing something, this is not explained anywhere, but it is
>>>>>> not entirely trivial to understand. I think it should be documented.
>>>
>>> I agree. I couldn't find any mention of what this int was supposed to be by looking at Documentation/ (is_visible is not even mentioned :/) or include/linux/sysfs.h. Once we settle on something I'll document it before sending a v2.
>>>
>> In the include file ? No strong preference, though.
>>
>>> By the way, I wrote a quick coccinelle script to match is_visible() users which reference the index (included below), and it found references to drivers which do not seem to use any binary attributes, so I believe changing the index meaning shouldn't be an issue.
>>>
>> Good.
>>
>>>>> I agree, make i the number of the bin attribute and that should solve
>>>>> this issue.
>>>>>
>>>> No, that would conflict with the "normal" use of is_visible for non-binary
>>>> attributes, and make the index all but useless, since the is_visible function
>>>> would have to search through all the attributes anyway to figure out which one
>>>> is being checked.
>>>
>>> Yeah, using the same indexes would be somewhat pointless, although not many seem to be using it anyway (only 14 files matched). Others seem to be comparing the attr* instead. An alternative would be to use negative indexes for binary attributes and positive indexes for normal attributes.
>>>
>> ... and I probably wrote or reviewed a significant percentage of those ;-).
>>
>> Using negative numbers for binary attributes is an interesting idea.
>> Kind of unusual, though. Greg, any thoughts on that ?
>
> Ick, no, that's a mess, maybe we just could drop the index alltogether?
>

No, please don't. Having to manually compare dozens of index pointers would be
even more of a mess.

Guenter


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH 1/3] sysfs: Fix is_visible() support for binary attributes Emilio López <emilio.lopez@collabora.co.uk> - 2015-09-08 14:10 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 1/3] sysfs: Fix is_visible() support for binary attributes Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2015-09-08 17:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 1/3] sysfs: Fix is_visible() support for binary attributes Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2015-09-08 21:20 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 1/3] sysfs: Fix is_visible() support for binary attributes Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2015-09-08 21:40 +0200
        Re: [PATCH 1/3] sysfs: Fix is_visible() support for binary attributes Emilio López <emilio.lopez@collabora.co.uk> - 2015-09-09 03:00 +0200
          Re: [PATCH 1/3] sysfs: Fix is_visible() support for binary attributes Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2015-09-09 03:20 +0200
            Re: [PATCH 1/3] sysfs: Fix is_visible() support for binary attributes Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2015-09-09 06:00 +0200
              Re: [PATCH 1/3] sysfs: Fix is_visible() support for binary attributes Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2015-09-09 06:20 +0200
                Re: [PATCH 1/3] sysfs: Fix is_visible() support for binary attributes Emilio López <emilio.lopez@collabora.co.uk> - 2015-09-09 15:20 +0200
                Re: [PATCH 1/3] sysfs: Fix is_visible() support for binary attributes Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2015-09-09 15:40 +0200
                Re: [PATCH 1/3] sysfs: Fix is_visible() support for binary attributes Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2015-09-09 20:30 +0200

csiph-web