Groups > linux.kernel > #1220038

Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/1] Revert "spi/doc: spi_master_put must be followed up by kfree"

From	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/1] Revert "spi/doc: spi_master_put must be followed up by kfree"
Date	2015-09-07 12:20 +0200
Message-ID	<q61GO-2Bq-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<q5urv-5CW-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <q5vGV-7yK-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <q5w0h-7V2-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Sun, Sep 06, 2015 at 03:22:43AM +0300, Alexey Klimov wrote:

> Sorry. Right now I see how I screwed up. Should I re-send it as single
> patch with all info included (marking as RESEND)?

No, it's OK - the patch itself was clear enough and I already applied it.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[PATCH RESEND 0/1] Revert "spi/doc: spi_master_put must be followed  up by kfree" Alexey Klimov <alexey.klimov@linaro.org> - 2015-09-06 00:50 +0200
  Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/1] Revert "spi/doc: spi_master_put must be  followed up by kfree" Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2015-09-06 02:10 +0200
    Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/1] Revert "spi/doc: spi_master_put must be  followed up by kfree" Alexey Klimov <klimov.linux@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 02:30 +0200
      Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/1] Revert "spi/doc: spi_master_put must be  followed up by kfree" Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2015-09-07 12:20 +0200

csiph-web